Mid-upper arm circumference and weight-for-height to identify high-risk malnourished under-five children

André Briend1, Bernard Maire, Olivier Fontaine

  • 1Department of International Health, University of Tampere Medical School, Tampere, Finland. andre.briend@gmail.com

Maternal & Child Nutrition
|September 29, 2011
PubMed

Insights

Mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC) alone is better than combining it with weight-for-height z-score (WHZ) for identifying children with severe acute malnutrition (SAM) at high risk of death. This finding simplifies diagnostic criteria for better child survival outcomes.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatrics
  • Global Health
  • Nutritional Epidemiology

Background:

  • Severe acute malnutrition (SAM) is a critical global health issue affecting children worldwide.
  • Current diagnostic criteria for non-oedematous SAM include mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC) < 115 mm or weight-for-height z-score (WHZ) < -3.
  • Accurate identification of SAM cases at high risk of mortality is crucial for timely intervention.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of combining MUAC and WHZ criteria for predicting mortality in children with SAM.
  • To determine if using both MUAC and WHZ offers additional benefit over using either criterion alone in identifying high-risk children.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized data from a longitudinal study in rural Senegal on anthropometry and mortality.
  • Constructed receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for MUAC and WHZ to assess their predictive ability for mortality.
  • Positioned the diagnostic thresholds (MUAC < 115 mm and WHZ < -3) on the ROC curves to compare their performance.

Main Results:

  • Mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC) demonstrated superior predictive accuracy for mortality compared to weight-for-height z-score (WHZ), as indicated by its higher ROC curve.
  • The combined criteria (WHZ < -3 and/or MUAC < 115 mm) did not improve mortality prediction compared to MUAC alone.
  • Both diagnostic thresholds fell below the MUAC ROC curve, suggesting MUAC is a more sensitive indicator of mortality risk.

Conclusions:

  • There is no added benefit in combining WHZ < -3 and MUAC < 115 mm for identifying children with SAM at high risk of death.
  • Utilizing MUAC < 115 mm alone is a preferable and more effective diagnostic criterion for identifying high-risk SAM cases.
  • Simplifying diagnostic criteria using MUAC can enhance the identification and management of severely malnourished children.

Related Concept Videos

Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Assessing Blood Pressure01:10

Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Assessing Blood Pressure

Accurate blood pressure assessment is crucial for diagnosing and managing various health conditions. To ensure the reliability of these measurements, healthcare professionals must adhere to standardized pre-procedural guidelines. These guidelines enhance patient safety and improve the overall quality of healthcare. The following steps are essential for obtaining accurate and consistent blood pressure readings, from using the appropriate tools to ensuring effective communication with the patient.