Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Choosing between cancer patients.

B A Stoll1

  • 1St Thomas's Hospital, London.

Journal of Medical Ethics
|June 1, 1990
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Selecting patients for priority in healthcare is a critical ethical challenge. Guidelines for resource allocation, especially for cancer patients, require societal consensus and public debate for fair decision-making.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Radiation sickness; a clinical investigation.

The Journal of the Faculty of Radiologists. Faculty of Radiologists (Great Britain)·2014
Same author

Endocrine therapy - the future.

Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine·2010
Same author

Cyclophosphamide in Advanced Breast Cancer.

British medical journal·2010
Same author

Corticosteroids in Therapy of Advanced Mammary Cancer.

British medical journal·2010
Same author

Radiation-induced Peripheral Neuropathy.

British medical journal·2010
Same author

Linkage between retinoid and fatty acid receptors: implications for breast cancer prevention.

European journal of cancer prevention : the official journal of the European Cancer Prevention Organisation (ECP)·2002
Same journal

Assisted dying and autonomy as an end in itself: a response to Donaldson.

Journal of medical ethics·2026
Same journal

Ethics briefing.

Journal of medical ethics·2026
Same journal

Medical ethics and categorisation.

Journal of medical ethics·2026
Same journal

Suspension or prioritisation? Exploring the ethics of age-based rationing in adult ADHD services.

Journal of medical ethics·2026
Same journal

Ethics of not knowing who we are talking to in qualitative research.

Journal of medical ethics·2026
Same journal

Suicide is not a public health issue and perhaps very few things should be.

Journal of medical ethics·2026
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Medical Ethics
  • Healthcare Resource Allocation
  • Oncology

Background:

  • Healthcare systems face increasing ethical dilemmas regarding patient prioritization.
  • Limited resources necessitate difficult decisions about who receives treatment first.
  • Cancer care presents complex scenarios for ethical resource allocation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To discuss criteria for prioritizing cancer patients when resources are scarce.
  • To highlight the need for agreed-upon guidelines for medical decision-making.
  • To emphasize the importance of societal acceptance in healthcare rationing.

Main Methods:

  • Discussion of ethical principles in patient selection.
  • Analysis of criteria for prioritizing cancer patients.
Keywords:
Health Care and Public Health

Related Experiment Videos

  • Exploration of the role of public and expert consensus.

    • Main Results:

    • Patient prioritization is a leading ethical issue in medicine.
    • Guidelines for prioritizing patients require agreement among clinicians, ethicists, and the public.
    • Societal acceptance is crucial for non-explicit rationing systems.

    Conclusions:

    • Developing clear, ethically sound criteria for patient prioritization is essential.
    • Public debate and multidisciplinary input are necessary for complex ethical choices.
    • A national committee may be required to advise on difficult prioritization decisions.