Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 29, 2026

Identification and Classification of Position-specific GABAA Receptor Subunit Missense Variants for Their Role In Hippocampal Pyramidal Neurons
Published on: June 6, 2025
A comparative study of support vector machine, artificial neural network and bayesian classifier for mutagenicity
Anju Sharma1, Rajnish Kumar, Pritish Kumar Varadwaj
1Department of Bioinformatics, Indian Institute of Information Technology Allahabad Deoghat, Jhalwa, Allahabad, 211012, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Abstract:
Mutagenicity is the capability of a chemical to carry out mutations in genetic material of an organism. In order to curtail expensive drug failures due to mutagenicity found in late development or even in clinical trials, it is crucial to determine potential mutagenicity problems as early as possible. In this work we have proposed three different classifiers, i.e. Support Vector Machine (SVM), Artificial Neural Network (ANN) and bayesian classifiers, for the prediction of mutagenicity of compounds based on seventeen descriptors. Among the three classifiers Radial Basis Function (RBF) kernel based SVM classifier appeared to be more accurate for classifying the compounds under study on mutagens and non-mutagens. The overall prediction accuracy of SVM model was found to be 71.73% which was appreciably higher than the accuracy of ANN based classifier (59.72%) and bayesian classifier (66.61%). It suggests that SVM based prediction model can be used for predicting mutagenicity more accurately compared to ANN and bayesian classifier for data under consideration.
Related Concept Videos
Mutagenicity and Carcinogenicity
In vitro Mutagenesis
In-vitro Mutagenesis
Classification of Neurotransmitters
Mismatch Repair
The Mutator Protein Family Plays a Key Role in DNA Mismatch Repair
The human genome has more than 3 billion base pairs of DNA per cell. Prior to cell division, that vast amount of genetic...