Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 28, 2026

A Murine Model of Hemodialysis Access-Related Hand Dysfunction
Published on: May 31, 2022
Cardiac and vascular structure and function parameters do not improve with alternate nightly home hemodialysis: an
Carolyn L van Eps1, Leanne Jeffriess, Brian Haluska
1Department of Nephrology Princess Alexandra Hospital, Ipswich Rd, Brisbane, 4102, Australia. Carolyn_van_Eps@health.qld.gov.au
Insights
Alternate nightly home hemodialysis (NHD) did not improve cardiovascular structure or function in patients despite better blood pressure control. Further research is needed to optimize intensive hemodialysis for cardiovascular health.
Area of Science:
- Nephrology
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Dialysis Therapy
Background:
- Extended hours hemodialysis may benefit cardiovascular health but faces sustainability and cost challenges.
- The impact of alternate nightly home hemodialysis (NHD) on cardiovascular structure and function remains unclear.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the effect of converting from standard hemodialysis (SHD) to NHD on cardiovascular structure and function.
- To assess changes in endothelial function, arterial stiffness, and oxidative stress markers.
Main Methods:
- Sixty-three patients switched from SHD to NHD (6-10 hours/session, 3-5 times/week).
- Cardiovascular parameters (echocardiography, BAR, CIMT, TAC, AIX) and oxidative stress markers (MDA, CAT, GPX, SOD, TAS) were measured at baseline and follow-up.
Main Results:
- Left ventricular mass index (LVMI) remained stable; no significant changes in diastolic function, CIMT, BAR, or TAC were observed.
- Augmentation index (AIX) increased, indicating worsening arterial stiffness.
- NHD improved bone mineral metabolism and blood pressure control, but interdialytic weight gains increased.
Conclusions:
- Conversion to NHD did not improve cardiovascular structure and function, despite improvements in uremic toxin control and some risk factors.
- Suboptimal control of uremic toxins and interdialytic weight gains may explain the lack of benefit.
- Further randomized trials are needed to determine optimal dialysis regimens for cardiovascular health and quality of life.
Background:
Nightly extended hours hemodialysis may improve left ventricular hypertrophy and function and endothelial function but presents problems of sustainability and increased cost. The effect of alternate nightly home hemodialysis (NHD) on cardiovascular structure and function is not known.
Methods:
Sixty-three patients on standard hemodialysis (SHD: 3.5-6 hours/session, 3-5 sessions weekly) converted to NHD (6-10 hours/session overnight for 3-5 sessions weekly). 2Dimensional transthoracic echocardiography and ultrasound measures of brachial artery reactivity (BAR), carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT), total arterial compliance (TAC) and augmentation index (AIX) were performed post dialysis at baseline and 18-24 months following conversion to NHD. In 37 patients, indices of oxidative stress: plasma malonyldialdehyde (MDA) and anti-oxidant enzymes: catalase (CAT), glutathione peroxidase (GPX) and superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity and total antioxidant status (TAS) were measured at baseline, 3 and 6 months.
Results:
Left ventricular mass index (LVMI) remained stable. Despite significant derangement at baseline, there were no changes in diastolic function measures, CIMT, BAR and TAC. AIX increased. Conversion to NHD improved bone mineral metabolism parameters and blood pressure control. Interdialytic weight gains increased. No definite improvements in measures of oxidative stress were demonstrated.
Conclusions:
Despite improvement in uremic toxin levels and some cardiovascular risk factors, conversion to an alternate nightly NHD regimen did not improve cardiovascular structure and function. Continuing suboptimal control of uremic toxins and interdialytic weight gains may be a possible explanation. This study adds to the increasing uncertainty about the nature of improvement in cardiovascular parameters with conversion to intensive hemodialysis regimens. Future randomized controlled trials will be important to determine whether increases in dialysis session duration, frequency or both are most beneficial for improving cardiovascular disease whilst minimizing costs and the impact of dialysis on quality of life.
Related Concept Videos
Hemodialysis II: Procedure and Complications
Hemodialysis I: Introduction
Hemodialysis III: Nursing Management
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy
Dialysis
Acute kidney injury develops suddenly and can be caused by pre-renal causes (e.g., hypovolemia, shock), intrinsic renal causes (e.g., acute tubular necrosis), or post-renal causes (e.g., urinary obstruction). In contrast, chronic renal failure progresses gradually over time and is often...
