Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Cause and Effect01:53

Cause and Effect

While variables are sometimes correlated because one does cause the other, it could also be that some other factor, a confounding variable, is actually causing the systematic movement in our variables of interest. For instance, as sales in ice cream increase, so does the overall rate of crime. Is it possible that indulging in your favorite flavor of ice cream could send you on a crime spree? Or, after committing crime do you think you might decide to treat yourself to a cone?
Fundamental Attribution Error01:14

Fundamental Attribution Error

According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is called the fundamental attribution...
Theory of Attribution I: Correspondent Inference Theory01:15

Theory of Attribution I: Correspondent Inference Theory

Correspondent inference theory, proposed by Jones and Davis in 1965, seeks to explain how individuals infer stable personality traits from observed behaviors. It suggests that people attribute actions to underlying dispositions rather than external circumstances, particularly when the behavior appears intentional and socially significant.Voluntary Behavior and Dispositional AttributionAccording to this theory, individuals are more likely to attribute behavior to personal traits when it appears...
Theory of Attribution II: Kelley's Covariation Theory01:29

Theory of Attribution II: Kelley's Covariation Theory

Attribution theory plays a crucial role in social psychology, helping to explain how individuals interpret the causes of behavior. One prominent model within this field is Harold Kelley's covariation theory, which provides a systematic approach to determining whether internal traits or external circumstances drive a person's actions. The model posits that individuals rely on three key types of information—consensus, consistency, and distinctiveness—to make these judgments.Consensus: Comparing...
Counterfactual Thinking01:19

Counterfactual Thinking

Counterfactual thinking is a cognitive process wherein individuals mentally reconstruct alternative versions of past events, often beginning with “what if” or “if only.” This reflective mechanism plays a significant role in shaping emotional experiences and guiding future behavior. Though typically triggered by unfavorable or unexpected outcomes, counterfactual thinking can also emerge in mundane, everyday decisions and experiences, revealing its deep entrenchment in human cognition.Types of...
Correlation and Causation01:27

Correlation and Causation

Statistical tests can calculate whether there is a relationship, or correlation, between independent and dependent variables. An indirect relationship of the variables signifies a correlation, while a direct relationship shows causation. If it is determined that no connection exists between the variables, then the correlation is a coincidence.
Correlation versus Causation
If the dependent variable increases or decreases when the independent variable increases, there is a positive or negative...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Choice effects on temporal binding of action and outcomes: Examining the role of outcome focus and measures of time interval estimation.

Acta psychologica·2024
Same author

Obedience induces agentic shifts by increasing the perceived time between own action and results.

Scientific reports·2024
Same author

The effects of social presence on cooperative trust with algorithms.

Scientific reports·2023
Same author

How the environment evokes actions that lead to different goals: the role of object multi-functionality in pavlovian-to-instrumental transfer.

Current psychology (New Brunswick, N.J.)·2023
Same author

Environmental control of social goals: using Pavlovian-to-instrumental transfer to test cue-based pro-self and pro-social outcome responses.

Royal Society open science·2023
Same author

Habit formation of preventive behaviours during the COVID-19 pandemic: a longitudinal study of physical distancing and hand washing.

BMC public health·2022

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 28, 2026

Characterization of the Sense of Agency over the Actions of Neural-machine Interface-operated Prostheses
05:21

Characterization of the Sense of Agency over the Actions of Neural-machine Interface-operated Prostheses

Published on: January 7, 2019

Prime and probability: causal knowledge affects inferential and predictive effects on self-agency experiences.

Anouk van der Weiden1, Henk Aarts, Kirsten I Ruys

  • 1Department of Psychology, Utrecht University, PO Box 80140, 3508 TC, Utrecht, The Netherlands. a.vanderweiden@uu.nl

Consciousness and Cognition
|October 4, 2011
PubMed
Summary

This study reveals that our sense of self-agency depends on learning the causal link between actions and outcomes. Motor predictions influence self-agency only when this causal knowledge is relevant, unlike inference effects.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 28, 2026

Characterization of the Sense of Agency over the Actions of Neural-machine Interface-operated Prostheses
05:21

Characterization of the Sense of Agency over the Actions of Neural-machine Interface-operated Prostheses

Published on: January 7, 2019

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Psychology

Background:

  • Sense of self-agency arises from action-outcome predictions and causal inferences.
  • The interplay between prediction and inference in self-agency experiences remains unclear.
  • Prior research suggests prediction and inference effects on self-agency are influenced by causal knowledge.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how motor predictions and causal inferences combine to affect self-agency.
  • To determine the role of relevant causal knowledge in modulating these effects.
  • To explore the conditions under which prediction and inference contribute to self-agency.

Main Methods:

  • Manipulated causal knowledge by varying action-outcome co-occurrence probabilities (50% vs. 80%).
  • Measured self-agency experiences in an action-outcome task.
  • Varied outcome priming to assess prediction and inference effects.

Main Results:

  • Motor prediction influenced self-agency only when relevant causal relationships between actions and outcomes were learned.
  • Inference effects on self-agency were observed even without relevant causal knowledge acquisition.
  • The relevance of causal knowledge critically impacts the contribution of motor prediction to self-agency.

Conclusions:

  • Self-agency experiences are shaped by both predictive and inferential processes.
  • Learned causal relationships are crucial for prediction-based self-agency.
  • Inference mechanisms contribute to self-agency independently of learned causal relevance.