Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 28, 2026

Non-fluoroscopic Catheter Tracking for Fluoroscopy Reduction in Interventional Electrophysiology
Published on: May 26, 2015
Prediction of cardiac rhythm 1 year following cardioversion for atrial fibrillation
Amjad K Hamid1, A Mark Richards, Ian G Crozier
1Department of Medicine, Otago University-Christchurch, Christchurch, New Zealand. amjadh@cdhb.govt.nz
Insights
Immediate cardioversion (CV) for atrial fibrillation (AF) offers better sinus rhythm (SR) outcomes than elective CV. The number of shocks needed is a new predictor of long-term SR success after AF CV.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Electrophysiology
Background:
- Limited recent data exists on cardioversion outcomes for atrial fibrillation (AF) or flutter.
- Predicting cardiac rhythm success after cardioversion is crucial for patient management.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate cardiac rhythm outcomes following elective and immediate cardioversion for AF or flutter.
- To identify predictors of maintaining sinus rhythm (SR) post-cardioversion.
Main Methods:
- A single-center study documented rhythm at 6 weeks and 12 months post-cardioversion.
- Included 496 patients undergoing elective cardioversion (EC) and 52 undergoing immediate cardioversion (IC).
Main Results:
- Immediate cardioversion (IC) patients had higher SR rates (65% at 6 weeks, 58% at 1 year) compared to elective cardioversion (EC) patients (43% and 30%).
- Amiodarone therapy and atrial flutter were positive predictors of SR at 6 weeks.
- Multiple shocks and longer arrhythmia duration predicted lower SR success at both 6 weeks and 1 year.
Conclusions:
- The number of shocks required to achieve SR is a novel, independent predictor of rhythm outcome after elective cardioversion.
- Immediate cardioversion demonstrates superior short- and long-term rhythm control compared to elective cardioversion.
Background:
There is little recent information regarding outcome and its determinants following cardioversion (CV) for atrial fibrillation (AF) or flutter. This study aims to help improve prediction of cardiac rhythm outcome following CV for AF.
Methods:
Cardiac rhythm at 6 weeks and 12 months was documented following elective (EC; n=496) or immediate (IC; n=52) cardioversion for AF or atrial flutter in a single referral centre.
Results:
65 and 58% of IC patients remained in sinus rhythm (SR) 6 weeks and 1 year after CV (respectively) compared with 43% and 30% in EC patients (P<0.001). Independent positive predictors of SR 6 weeks after cardioversion included amiodarone therapy (OR 2.04 [1.28-3.33], P<0.01) and atrial flutter (OR 1.85 [1.09-3.13], P<0.05). Negative predictors included the need for >1 shock to achieve SR (OR 1.61 [1.12-2.37], P=0.011) and arrhythmia duration, (OR 0.96 [0.95-0.97], P<0.001). At 1 year, amiodarone, duration of arrhythmia and the need for >1 shock remained independent predictors of rhythm.
Conclusions:
The number of shocks required to achieve SR is a newly demonstrated independent predictor of rhythm outcome after elective CV.
Related Concept Videos
ECG Interpretation of Arrhythmias II: Atrial, Junctional and Ventricular Arrhythmias
Disturbances in Heart Rhythm
Arrhythmias are categorized by their speed, rhythm, and origin. A slow heart...
Dysrhythmias V: Evaluating Dysrhythmias
Electrophysiology of Normal Cardiac Rhythm
Dysrhythmias II: Classification of Tachyarrhythmias
Dysrhythmias VI: Management of Dysrhythmias

