Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Interpretation of Confidence Intervals01:19

Interpretation of Confidence Intervals

A confidence interval is a better estimate of the population than a point estimate, as it uses a range of values from a sample instead of a single value.
Confidence intervals have confidence coefficients that are crucial for their interpretation. The most common confidence coefficients are 0.90, 0.95, and 0.99, which can be written as percentages–90%, 95%, and 99%, respectively.
Suppose a person calculates a confidence interval with a confidence coefficient of 0.95. In that case, they can...
Confidence Intervals01:21

Confidence Intervals

An unbiased point estimate is often insufficient to predict a population estimate, such as population mean or population proportion. In this scenario, a confidence interval is used. A confidence interval is an estimate similar to a sample proportion. However, unlike the point estimate which is a single value, the confidence interval contains a range of values. These values have lower and upper limits, known as confidence limits, and can be designated as L1 and L2, respectively.
A confidence...
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing01:13

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5% chance...
Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals00:54

Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals

The confidence interval is the range of values around the mean that contains the true mean. It is expressed as a probability percentage. The interpretation of a 95% confidence interval, for instance, is that the statistician is 95% confident that the true mean falls within the interval. The upper and lower limits of this range are known as confidence limits. The confidence limits for the true mean are estimated from the sample's mean, the standard deviation, and the statistical factor 't,' or...
Bonferroni Test01:10

Bonferroni Test

The Bonferroni test is a statistical test named after Carlo Emilio Bonferroni, an Italian mathematician best known for Bonferroni inequalities. This statistical test is a type of multiple comparison test to determine which means are different than the rest. Bonferroni test can minimize the Type 1 error by reducing the significance level alpha, which otherwise increases with sample pairs.
The means of different samples are first paired in all possible combinations.
The null hypothesis of the...
Confidence Interval for Estimating Population Mean01:25

Confidence Interval for Estimating Population Mean

A point estimate of the population mean is obtained from a single sample. Such a point estimate does not represent a population well because it needs to account for variability in the population. Single point estimate can also be biased despite the sample being selected randomly. Thus, a point estimate is often unreliable. A confidence interval is needed to reduce this unreliability.
A confidence interval for the mean is a range of values that provides an estimate of the population mean. As the...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

ICG fluorescence imaging-guided bile leak detection to reduce clinically relevant bile leakage after hepatectomy: A protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.

PloS one·2026
Same author

Mechanical thromboprophylaxis for preventing intradialytic hypotension in people undergoing maintenance haemodialysis.

The Cochrane database of systematic reviews·2026
Same author

Heart failure and renal outcomes with angiotensin receptor blockers compared with calcium channel blockers in patients with chronic kidney disease: a target trial emulation.

Heart (British Cardiac Society)·2026
Same author

Clinical effectiveness of telepharmacy services in patients with non-communicable diseases in ambulatory care settings.

The Cochrane database of systematic reviews·2026
Same author

Cognitive and behavioural skills to prevent major depression among adults with subthreshold depression: 50-week follow-up analysis of smartphone CBT randomised trials (RESiLIENT trial).

The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science·2026
Same author

Risk of urinary tract infection with SGLT2 inhibitor initiation in patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases and type 2 diabetes: A target trial emulation using a Japanese hospital-based claims database.

Journal of diabetes investigation·2026
Same journal

Interpretable Bayesian Modeling for Multireader Multicase Studies: Addressing Overdispersion and Limited Sample Size in Diagnostic Enhancement Evaluation.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Adaptive Sequential Multiple Hypotheses Testing for Concomitant Vaccine Safety Surveillance.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Novel Distance Regression for Repeated Outcomes With Missing Data: Applications to Longitudinal and Crossover Studies of Microbiome Beta-Diversity.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Optimal Weighted Tests for Replication Studies and the 'Two-Trials Rule' With Multiple Hypotheses.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Identifiable Copula-Double-Cox Models: A Fully Parametric Framework for Dependent Right-Censored Survival Data.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Moving From Individualized Risk-Based Prevention to Benefit-Based Prevention: Estimating Individualized Life-Years Gained From Prevention Services as a Basis for Eligibility.

Statistics in medicine·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 28, 2026

The Adjuvant Efficacy of Angong Niuhuang Pill in the Treatment of Viral Encephalitis: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
08:36

The Adjuvant Efficacy of Angong Niuhuang Pill in the Treatment of Viral Encephalitis: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Published on: April 19, 2024

Confidence intervals for a random-effects meta-analysis based on Bartlett-type corrections.

Hisashi Noma1

  • 1Department of Biostatistics, Kyoto University School of Public Health, Kyoto, Japan. nomahi@bstat.mbox.media.kyoto-u.ac.jp

Statistics in Medicine
|October 4, 2011
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

New confidence intervals improve accuracy in medical meta-analysis, especially with fewer studies. These methods offer better coverage probability for average treatment effects compared to traditional approaches.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 28, 2026

The Adjuvant Efficacy of Angong Niuhuang Pill in the Treatment of Viral Encephalitis: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
08:36

The Adjuvant Efficacy of Angong Niuhuang Pill in the Treatment of Viral Encephalitis: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Published on: April 19, 2024

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Medical Statistics
  • Clinical Trials

Background:

  • The DerSimonian-Laird confidence interval is standard in medical meta-analysis for average treatment effect.
  • Its coverage probability is often inadequate, particularly when the number of studies is small (typically <20).
  • This limitation stems from reliance on large sample approximations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop novel confidence intervals with improved coverage properties for medical meta-analysis.
  • To address the limitations of existing methods in scenarios with a moderate number of studies.

Main Methods:

  • Development of three new confidence intervals based on statistical corrections.
  • Utilizing the Bartlett corrected likelihood ratio statistic.
  • Employing the efficient score statistic and a Bartlett-type adjustment.

Main Results:

  • The proposed confidence intervals demonstrated superior coverage properties in simulation studies.
  • Bartlett and Bartlett-type corrected intervals performed well, especially with a moderate number of studies.
  • Outperformed existing methods in numerical evaluations.

Conclusions:

  • The new confidence intervals offer enhanced accuracy for estimating average treatment effects in meta-analyses.
  • Recommended for use in medical meta-analyses, particularly when study numbers are limited.
  • The developed methods provide a more reliable statistical framework for clinical research synthesis.