Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 28, 2026

Glaucoma-inducing Procedure in an In Vivo Rat Model and Whole-mount Retina Preparation
Published on: March 12, 2016
[Arguments against pressure-lowering treatment of ocular hypertension. Prophylactic treatment is unnecessary]
1Augenklinik Kantonsspital, Winterthur, Schweiz. joerg.stuermer@ksw.ch
Insights
For ocular hypertension (OHT), watchful waiting is best unless intraocular pressure (IOP) is very high or glaucoma risk is significant. Early treatment is reserved for high-risk patients or those showing disease progression.
Area of Science:
- Ophthalmology
- Glaucoma Research
- Clinical Decision-Making
Context:
- Ocular hypertension (OHT) management is debated, balancing potential benefits of intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering treatment against the principle of "first do no harm."
- Current diagnostic criteria for OHT are questioned due to IOP measurement imprecision and IOP being a risk factor, not a definitive sign, of glaucoma.
- Prospective trials like OHTS and EGPS provide risk stratification data for glaucoma conversion.
Purpose:
- To critically evaluate the indications for initiating IOP-lowering treatment in patients diagnosed with ocular hypertension.
- To define thresholds for intervention based on IOP levels, individual glaucoma conversion risk, and the presence of glaucomatous changes.
- To emphasize the "watchful waiting" approach for low-to-intermediate risk OHT patients, prioritizing harm reduction.
Summary:
- IOP-lowering treatment for OHT is generally not recommended unless IOP exceeds 32 mmHg, due to measurement imprecision and IOP being only a risk factor for glaucoma.
- For IOP between 21-32 mmHg, glaucoma conversion risk must be assessed using validated risk calculators; only high-risk (>13%) individuals benefit from prophylactic treatment.
- The potential for local and systemic side effects of IOP-lowering medications outweighs the benefits for low-to-intermediate risk OHT patients, supporting a "watchful waiting" strategy.
Impact:
- This evidence-based approach aims to optimize patient outcomes by minimizing unnecessary treatment and associated risks in ocular hypertension management.
- Promotes a personalized treatment strategy, reserving interventions for those most likely to progress to glaucoma, thereby improving the risk-benefit ratio.
- Highlights the importance of ongoing monitoring for morphological or functional progression, enabling timely initiation of IOP-lowering therapy when clinically indicated.
Abstract:
The main argument against a pressure-lowering treatment for patients with ocular hypertension (OHT) is the principle of "first do no harm". The imprecision of intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements and the fact that increased IOP is only a risk factor for glaucoma raise major doubts on a clinical definition of OHT. The use of IOP-lowering treatment in the absence of functional or morphological glaucomatous changes should only be initiated if the IOP is very high (>32 mmHg). If the IOP is between 21 and 32 mmHg the glaucoma conversion risk of the individual patient should be estimated. The risk factors as proven in major prospective trials (OHTS/EGPS) should be assessed using the risk calculator. Only patients with a high risk (>13%) of conversion profit from prophylactic IOP-lowering treatment. For all patients with intermediate or low risk of conversion the potential side-effects (local and systemic) of the treatment outweigh the possible benefit, so that the principle of "watchful waiting" is the best for patients with OHT. If morphological or functional progression is observed IOP-lowering treatment should be started immediately.
Related Concept Videos
Open Angle Glaucoma: Treatment
Drugs such as carbonic anhydrase inhibitors, α2- and...
Angle Closure Glaucoma: Treatment
Glaucoma: Overview
Ophthalmic Drug Delivery Systems
Hypertension IV: Drug Therapy and Lifestyle Modifications
Hypertension III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
