Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Depth Perception and Spatial Vision01:15

Depth Perception and Spatial Vision

Depth perception is the ability to perceive objects three-dimensionally. It relies on two types of cues: binocular and monocular. Binocular cues depend on the combination of images from both eyes and how the eyes work together. Since the eyes are in slightly different positions, each eye captures a slightly different image. This disparity between images, known as binocular disparity, helps the brain interpret depth. When the brain compares these images, it determines the distance to an object.
Sensory Perception: Organization of the Somatosensory System01:11

Sensory Perception: Organization of the Somatosensory System

The somatosensory system is the central and peripheral nervous system component that senses and processes touch, pressure, pain, temperature, and body position or proprioception. The process of sensation takes place at three levels:
The receptor level:
The receptor level is the first stage of sensation. It involves the detection of a stimulus by specialized sensory receptors. The stimulus must arrive within the receptor's receptive field. Next, the receptor converts the energy of the stimulus...
Parallel Processing01:20

Parallel Processing

The brain processes sensory information rapidly due to parallel processing, which involves sending data across multiple neural pathways at the same time. This method allows the brain to manage various sensory qualities, such as shapes, colors, movements, and locations, all concurrently. For instance, when observing a forest landscape, the brain simultaneously processes the movement of leaves, the shapes of trees, the depth between them, and the various shades of green. This enables a quick and...
Motor and Sensory Areas of the Cortex01:14

Motor and Sensory Areas of the Cortex

The cerebral cortex, the brain's outermost layer, is pivotal in processing complex cognitive tasks, emotions, and various sensory inputs and executing voluntary motor activities. This intricate structure is divided into three primary functional areas: the motor areas, sensory areas, and association areas.
Motor Areas
The motor areas located in the frontal lobe are central to controlling voluntary movements. This region is further subdivided into the primary motor cortex and the premotor cortex.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Change of <i>d</i>-irection: current limitations and future directions in psychological meta-analysis.

Frontiers in psychology·2026
Same author

LOX Inhibition Disrupts a Collagen-Integrin-MYC Axis to Suppress Progression of Invasive Lobular Carcinoma.

Cancer research·2026
Same author

Self-Reported Attachment Styles in the Danish General Population: Gender and Age-Related Differences and Associations With Mental Health.

Scandinavian journal of psychology·2025
Same author

The spatial and temporal properties of the contour erasure effect and perceptual filling-in.

Journal of vision·2025
Same author

Visual search performance depends on the congruency of olfactory sensations.

Scientific reports·2025
Same author

Statistical analysis plan for a parallel group randomized clinical trial comparing schema therapy versus treatment as usual for outpatients with difficult-to-treat depression (DEPRE-ST).

Trials·2025
Same journal

Human thermal sensitivity drifts at extreme temperatures.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same journal

Dynamic competition between selective attention and spatial prediction during visual search.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same journal

Encapsulation of the visual perception of social events from semantic priming.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same journal

Biasmapping: Idiosyncratic covert search in the vicinity of fixation.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same journal

What are you still waiting for? Fricative recognition shows encapsulated processing and is partially predicted by secondary cue reliance.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same journal

Eye movements reveal that drivers can predict the location of hazards in dynamic road scenes but gaze and awareness are dissociable.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 28, 2026

Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects
08:13

Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects

Published on: May 10, 2019

Effects of spatial and selective attention on basic multisensory integration.

Matthias Gondan1, Steven P Blurton, Flavia Hughes

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Regensburg, Germany. gondan@imbi.uni-heidelberg.de

Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance
|October 5, 2011
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

The redundant signals effect (RSE) shows faster responses to audiovisual stimuli than unimodal ones. Attention influences this effect, with spatial attention shifting response criteria and selective attention altering evidence accumulation.

More Related Videos

Testing Sensory and Multisensory Function in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder
09:13

Testing Sensory and Multisensory Function in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder

Published on: April 22, 2015

Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control
09:37

Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control

Published on: July 5, 2015

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 28, 2026

Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects
08:13

Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects

Published on: May 10, 2019

Testing Sensory and Multisensory Function in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder
09:13

Testing Sensory and Multisensory Function in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder

Published on: April 22, 2015

Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control
09:37

Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control

Published on: July 5, 2015

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Human-Computer Interaction

Background:

  • The redundant signals effect (RSE) demonstrates faster reaction times to audiovisual stimuli compared to unimodal stimuli.
  • The RSE often exceeds predictions from probability summation, suggesting specialized neural integration mechanisms.
  • Understanding the influence of attention on RSE is crucial for elucidating multisensory integration processes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the impact of spatial and selective attention on the RSE in audiovisual redundant signals tasks.
  • To differentiate the roles of spatial distribution of attention versus task-specific attentional selection in modulating RSE.
  • To test the predictions of coactivation and race models in explaining RSE under varying attentional demands.

Main Methods:

  • Experiment 1: Manipulated spatial attention by presenting stimuli centrally (narrow focus) versus at unpredictable peripheral locations (wide focus).
  • Experiment 2: Varied attentional demands by using a simple response task (respond to all stimuli) versus a selective attention task (respond to central stimuli only).
  • Utilized reaction time measurements and computational modeling (coactivation model) to analyze RSE and evidence accumulation.

Main Results:

  • The RSE was consistently modeled by a coactivation model assuming linear superposition of modality-specific activation across both experiments.
  • Spatial attention effects in Experiment 1 were explained by a shift in the evidence criterion, not changes in processing speed.
  • In Experiment 2, while RSE remained consistent with task-specific coactivation models, the underlying evidence accumulation processes differed significantly between the simple and selective attention tasks.

Conclusions:

  • Audiovisual integration, as reflected by the RSE, is robust and can be explained by coactivation models.
  • Spatial attention modulates RSE primarily by adjusting response thresholds, while selective attention influences the dynamics of evidence accumulation.
  • These findings highlight the distinct roles of different attentional control mechanisms in shaping multisensory processing and response generation.