Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 28, 2026

Combined Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Electroencephalography of the Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex
Published on: August 17, 2018
Asymmetric versus symmetric pulses for cortical microstimulation
Andrew S Koivuniemi1, Kevin J Otto
1Weldon School of Biomedical Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA. akoivuni@purdue.edu
Intracortical microstimulation (ICMS) research shows cathode phase duration is key for neural stimulation thresholds. Asymmetric pulses offer no advantage over symmetric, cathode-leading pulses for sensory prostheses.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Biomedical Engineering
- Auditory Prosthetics
Background:
- Intracortical microstimulation (ICMS) is a promising platform for sensory prostheses.
- Typically, ICMS uses charged balanced, symmetric, biphasic stimulation.
- Asymmetric pulses may lower detection thresholds, according to neural models and cochlear implant studies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine the behavioral threshold for ICMS in rats.
- To investigate the effects of phase direction, asymmetry, and duration on ICMS detection thresholds.
- To compare symmetric and asymmetric pulse performance in auditory cortex stimulation.
Main Methods:
- Rats were chronically implanted with microelectrode arrays in the auditory cortex.
- Animals were trained to detect ICMS delivered via a single electrode site.
- Two experiments varied phase parameters (direction, asymmetry, duration) to assess detection thresholds.
Main Results:
- Cathode phase duration was the primary determinant of ICMS threshold level.
- Asymmetry provided no significant advantage over symmetric, cathode-leading pulses.
- Symmetric, anode-leading pulses showed higher thresholds than other pulse types at similar cathode durations.
Conclusions:
- For ICMS, optimizing cathode phase duration is crucial for effective neural stimulation.
- Pulse asymmetry does not appear to offer significant benefits for ICMS thresholds.
- Symmetric, anode-leading pulses may be less effective for auditory cortex stimulation compared to cathode-leading pulses.
More Related Videos
11:11Effects of Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation on the Primary Motor Cortex by Online Combined Approach with Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
Published on: September 23, 2017
12:13Assessing Primary Motor Cortex Excitability and Excitability Modulation by Pairing Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation with Electromyography
Published on: October 7, 2025