New dimensions in the quantitative classification of mental illness
Roman Kotov1, Camilo J Ruggero, Robert F Krueger
1Department of Psychiatry, Stony Brook University, NY 11794, USA. roman.kotov@stonybrook.edu
This study reveals a new 5-factor model of mental illness comorbidity in outpatients, identifying distinct internalizing, externalizing, thought disorder, somatoform, and antagonism dimensions. This refined classification aids clinical understanding and research in psychopathology.
Area of Science:
- Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology
- Quantitative Psychology
- Nosology and Classification
Background:
- Comorbidity patterns in mental disorders are believed to reflect the inherent organization of mental illness.
- Previous research identified three dimensions: internalizing, externalizing, and thought disorder, primarily using common disorders in community samples.
- The applicability of these dimensions to patient populations and the integration of other major disorders remained unclear.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the comorbidity structure among a broad spectrum of Axis I disorders and personality disorders (PDs) within a general outpatient setting.
- To test the fit of existing models and explore alternative organizational structures for mental disorders.
Main Methods:
- A clinical cohort study design was employed.
- Data were collected from 2900 outpatients seeking psychiatric treatment at the Rhode Island Methods to Improve Diagnostic Assessment and Services (MIDAS) project.
- The Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV and the Structured Interview for DSM-IV Personality were utilized for comprehensive assessment.
Main Results:
- The established Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition (DSM-IV) organization demonstrated a poor fit to the data.
- A five-factor model emerged as the best fit, comprising: internalizing (anxiety, eating disorders, major depressive episode, cluster C, borderline, and paranoid PDs); externalizing (substance use disorders, antisocial PD); thought disorder (psychosis, mania, cluster A PDs); somatoform (somatoform disorders); and antagonism (cluster B, paranoid PDs).
Conclusions:
- The study confirmed the validity of the three previously identified psychopathological spectra (internalizing, externalizing, thought disorder) in an outpatient context.
- Novel somatoform and antagonism dimensions were identified, attributed to the inclusion of diverse somatoform and personality disorders.
- Findings suggest that many personality disorders could be integrated with related Axis I disorders, and unipolar depression may align more closely with anxiety disorders than bipolar disorders. This quantitative approach offers a potentially more practical classification system for clinicians and researchers.
Related Concept Videos
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM)
Classification of Illness
An illness is a response to a disease in which the person's level of functioning is changed compared with a previous level. The general classification of illness includes acute and chronic.
Acute illness is severe and...
Dimensions of Health and Illness
Theoretical Approaches to Psychological Disorder
Biological approach
The biological approach posits that internal, organic factors are the primary causes of such disorders. This perspective emphasizes brain structure and function, genetic predispositions, and neurotransmitter imbalances. For example, schizophrenia has been associated with both genetic...
Introduction to Psychological Disorders
Deviant Behavior
Deviance in behavior refers to actions or thought patterns that significantly diverge from societal norms or...
How Data are Classified: Numerical Data
Quantitative data may be either discrete or continuous. All quantitative data that take on only specific numerical...


