Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Interpretation of Confidence Intervals01:19

Interpretation of Confidence Intervals

A confidence interval is a better estimate of the population than a point estimate, as it uses a range of values from a sample instead of a single value.
Confidence intervals have confidence coefficients that are crucial for their interpretation. The most common confidence coefficients are 0.90, 0.95, and 0.99, which can be written as percentages–90%, 95%, and 99%, respectively.
Suppose a person calculates a confidence interval with a confidence coefficient of 0.95. In that case, they can...
Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals00:54

Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals

The confidence interval is the range of values around the mean that contains the true mean. It is expressed as a probability percentage. The interpretation of a 95% confidence interval, for instance, is that the statistician is 95% confident that the true mean falls within the interval. The upper and lower limits of this range are known as confidence limits. The confidence limits for the true mean are estimated from the sample's mean, the standard deviation, and the statistical factor 't,' or...
Confidence Intervals01:21

Confidence Intervals

An unbiased point estimate is often insufficient to predict a population estimate, such as population mean or population proportion. In this scenario, a confidence interval is used. A confidence interval is an estimate similar to a sample proportion. However, unlike the point estimate which is a single value, the confidence interval contains a range of values. These values have lower and upper limits, known as confidence limits, and can be designated as L1 and L2, respectively.
A confidence...
Confidence Interval for Estimating Population Mean01:25

Confidence Interval for Estimating Population Mean

A point estimate of the population mean is obtained from a single sample. Such a point estimate does not represent a population well because it needs to account for variability in the population. Single point estimate can also be biased despite the sample being selected randomly. Thus, a point estimate is often unreliable. A confidence interval is needed to reduce this unreliability.
A confidence interval for the mean is a range of values that provides an estimate of the population mean. As the...
Estimating Population Mean with Unknown Standard Deviation01:22

Estimating Population Mean with Unknown Standard Deviation

In practice, we rarely know the population standard deviation. In the past, when the sample size was large, this did not present a problem to statisticians. They used the sample standard deviation s as an estimate for σ and proceeded as before to calculate a confidence interval with close enough results. However, statisticians ran into problems when the sample size was small. A small sample size caused inaccuracies in the confidence interval.
William S. Gosset (1876–1937) of the Guinness...
Confidence Coefficient01:24

Confidence Coefficient

The confidence coefficient is also known as the confidence level or degree of confidence. It is the percent expression for the probability, 1-α, that the confidence interval contains the true population parameter assuming that the confidence interval is obtained after sufficient unbiased sampling; for example, if the CL = 90%, then in 90 out of 100 samples the interval estimate will enclose the true population parameter. Here α is the area under the curve, distributed equally under both the...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Black Patients Underdiagnosed With Long COVID In The US Compared With White Patients.

Health affairs (Project Hope)·2026
Same author

Associations Between Micronutrient Status, Hormones, and Immune Status During Pregnancy and Child Growth in Rural Bangladesh: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Current developments in nutrition·2025
Same author

Rainfall and temperature influence effectiveness of on-site sanitation intervention against E. coli contamination in Bangladeshi households.

International journal of hygiene and environmental health·2025
Same author

Uptake and determinants of use of personal protective equipment for injury prevention among commercial motorcyclists in Limbe and Tiko health districts of the Southwest region, Cameroon: a community-based cross-sectional study.

Injury prevention : journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention·2025
Same author

Associations between floor material and E. coli contamination in rural Bangladeshi households.

International journal of hygiene and environmental health·2025
Same author

Associations between floor material and <i>E. coli</i> contamination in rural Bangladeshi households.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 28, 2026

Adapting Taylor Dispersion to Measure the Dispersion Coefficient of Electrolyte Solutions via an Accessible Microfluidic Setup
09:56

Adapting Taylor Dispersion to Measure the Dispersion Coefficient of Electrolyte Solutions via an Accessible Microfluidic Setup

Published on: October 7, 2025

Confidence intervals for negative binomial random variables of high dispersion.

David Shilane1, Steven N Evans, Alan E Hubbard

  • 1Stanford University, CA, USA.

The International Journal of Biostatistics
|October 5, 2011
PubMed
Summary

Standard methods for Negative Binomial confidence intervals fail with high dispersion. New techniques using Bernstein

More Related Videos

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons
07:13

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

Digital PCR-based Competitive Index for High-throughput Analysis of Fitness in Salmonella
07:11

Digital PCR-based Competitive Index for High-throughput Analysis of Fitness in Salmonella

Published on: May 13, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 28, 2026

Adapting Taylor Dispersion to Measure the Dispersion Coefficient of Electrolyte Solutions via an Accessible Microfluidic Setup
09:56

Adapting Taylor Dispersion to Measure the Dispersion Coefficient of Electrolyte Solutions via an Accessible Microfluidic Setup

Published on: October 7, 2025

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons
07:13

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

Digital PCR-based Competitive Index for High-throughput Analysis of Fitness in Salmonella
07:11

Digital PCR-based Competitive Index for High-throughput Analysis of Fitness in Salmonella

Published on: May 13, 2019

Area of Science:

  • Statistics
  • Probability Theory
  • Data Analysis

Background:

  • Confidence intervals for the mean of a Negative Binomial distribution are crucial in various fields.
  • Large sample sizes often lead to the use of Normal distribution approximations for interval construction.
  • High dispersion in Negative Binomial data can challenge the accuracy of standard interval methods.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the limitations of Normal approximation and bootstrap methods for Negative Binomial confidence intervals.
  • To propose and evaluate alternative methods for constructing accurate confidence intervals.
  • To provide guidelines for assessing the performance and applicability of different interval estimation techniques.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of the convergence rate of the sample mean of Negative Binomial distributions to the Normal distribution.
  • Development of new confidence interval methods based on Bernstein's inequality, Gamma, and Chi Square distributions.
  • Simulation experiments comparing proposed methods with standard Normal approximation and bootstrap techniques.

Main Results:

  • Standard Normal approximation and bootstrap methods result in overly narrow confidence intervals and undercoverage for highly dispersed Negative Binomial data, especially at small sample sizes.
  • Proposed methods utilizing Bernstein's inequality, Gamma, and Chi Square distributions demonstrate improved accuracy and coverage.
  • A ratio statistic is proposed to guide the selection and evaluation of the Chi Square method and other interval types.

Conclusions:

  • The Normal approximation is unreliable for Negative Binomial confidence intervals when dispersion is high.
  • Alternative methods based on Bernstein's inequality and distribution theory offer more robust and accurate confidence intervals.
  • The proposed ratio statistic aids in determining the suitability of methods for specific Negative Binomial datasets.