Insights
Ticagrelor, combined with aspirin, reduced overall mortality and myocardial infarction in acute coronary syndrome patients compared to clopidogrel. However, it increased bleeding risk and did not significantly improve outcomes in stented patients.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Acute coronary syndromes (ACS) require effective revascularization and antithrombotic therapy.
- Standard treatment involves heparin and aspirin, with clopidogrel added for angioplasty with stenting.
- Ticagrelor is a newer antiplatelet agent approved for ACS in the EU, in combination with aspirin.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy and safety of ticagrelor plus aspirin compared to clopidogrel plus aspirin in ACS patients.
- To assess ticagrelor's impact on overall mortality, cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, and stent thrombosis.
- To analyze the adverse event profile, including bleeding, dyspnoea, and conduction disorders.
Main Methods:
- A large-scale, double-blind, randomized trial involving 18,624 ACS patients.
- Patients underwent angioplasty (64%), coronary artery bypass grafting (10%), or received medical treatment.
- Treatment duration was at least 9 months for half the patients, with a 12-month follow-up.
Main Results:
- Ticagrelor significantly lowered overall mortality (4.5% vs. 5.9%) and cardiovascular mortality (4.0% vs. 5.1%) compared to clopidogrel.
- Symptomatic myocardial infarction was less frequent with ticagrelor (5.8% vs. 6.9%), but stroke rates were similar.
- While not significantly reducing overall mortality in stented patients, ticagrelor decreased stent thrombosis (2.9% vs. 3.8%).
- Ticagrelor use led to more bleeding events (16.1% vs. 14.6%) but similar rates of major bleeding (11.5%).
- Increased dyspnoea (13.8% vs. 7.8%) and conduction disorders were observed with ticagrelor.
Conclusions:
- Ticagrelor plus aspirin demonstrated a mortality benefit in ACS patients compared to clopidogrel plus aspirin.
- The benefit in stented patients requires further evaluation, as overall mortality was not significantly reduced.
- Ticagrelor is associated with increased bleeding and specific adverse effects like dyspnoea, necessitating careful patient selection and monitoring.
Abstract:
Several revascularisation methods are effective in patients with acute coronary syndromes. Standard antithrombotic treatment combines heparin and aspirin during the acute phase, followed by long-term aspirin therapy. The only proven advantage of adding clopidogrel is for patients who undergo angioplasty with stenting. Ticagrelor is an antiplatelet drug belonging to a different chemical class than clopidogrel. Its chemical structure resembles that of adenosine. Ticagrelor has been authorised in the European Union for patients with acute coronary syndromes, in combination with aspirin. Clinical evaluation is mainly based on a double-blind randomised trial comparing ticagrelor + aspirin versus clopidogrel + aspirin in 18 624 patients who underwent angioplasty (64% of patients), coronary artery bypass grafting (10%), or who received medical treatment only. Half of the patients were treated for at least 9 months. After 12 months of treatment, compared to the clopidogrel group, overall mortality appeared to be significantly lower in the ticagrelor group (4.5% versus 5.9%), along with cardiovascular mortality (4.0% versus 5.1%). Symptomatic myocardial infarction was also less frequent (5.8% versus 6.9%), but not stroke (about 1.4% in both groups). Ticagrelor did not statistically significantly reduce overall mortality in patients who had angioplasty with stenting, but stent thrombosis was less frequent than with clopidogrel (2.9% versus 3.8%). In combination with aspirin, ticagrelor provoked more bleeding than clopidogrel, based on the definition used in the trial (16.1% versus 14.6%). In contrast, the rate of major bleeding was similar in the two groups (11.5%), including fatal bleeding (0.3%). The adverse effect profile of ticagrelor resembles that of adenosine in certain respects. For example, dyspnoea was more frequent with ticagrelor than with clopidogrel (13.8% versus 7.8%), as were conduction disorders and ventricular pauses at the beginning of treatment (5.8% versus 3.6%). There were also more cases of hyperuricaemia and elevated creatinine levels with ticagrelor. Ticagrelor and its active metabolite are substrates and inhibitors of cytochrome P450 isoenzymes and P-glycoprotein, creating a risk of multiple pharmacokinetic interactions. Pharmacodynamic interactions are also likely to occur, especially with antithrombotic agents and heart-rate-lowering drugs. In practice, in patients with an acute coronary syndrome treated with angioplasty and stenting, and who are also receiving aspirin, it remains to be shown whether the harm-benefit balance of ticagrelor is clearly better than that of clopidogrel. In other settings, there is no firm evidence that ticagrelor is better than aspirin alone.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction
Acute Coronary Syndrome II: Pathophysiology and Clinical Manifestations
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Antiplatelet Drugs: Prostaglandin Synthesis, P2Y12 and Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitors
Prostaglandin synthesis inhibitors, exemplified by the widely known aspirin, wield their power by irreversibly acetylating...
Acute Coronary Syndrome V: Nursing Management


