Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Timing and Consequences on Behavior01:08

Timing and Consequences on Behavior

In operant conditioning, the timing of reinforcement is crucial. For animals like rats and cats, immediate reinforcement (within a few seconds) is much more effective than delayed reinforcement. For example, a food reward for a rat needs to follow within 30 seconds of pressing a bar to be effective. 
Humans, however, can respond to delayed reinforcers. We often make decisions between immediate small rewards and delayed larger rewards. This ability to delay gratification is a significant factor...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Functional Analyses in Patient-Derived Neurons Establish Pathogenicity for <i>STXBP1</i> Splice Variant c.429+5G>A.

Human mutation·2026
Same author

Changing the Child: The Impact of Novel Treatments on the Identity of Children With Monogenic Neurodevelopmental Disorders.

Bioethics·2026
Same author

Announcement of special issue: 'Behavioural pharmacology of ketamine and psychedelic drugs'.

Behavioural pharmacology·2026
Same author

Melanocortin 3 Receptors Do Not Specifically Localize to Primary Cilia in Cultured Human and Rodent Neurons.

Cell biochemistry and function·2026
Same author

Challenges and expectations on the use of automated home cage monitoring for advancing laboratory animal care and welfare.

Laboratory animals·2026
Same author

What a viral TikTok taught me about personal storytelling in science.

Nature·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 28, 2026

Automated, Quantitative Cognitive/Behavioral Screening of Mice: For Genetics, Pharmacology, Animal Cognition and Undergraduate Instruction
16:23

Automated, Quantitative Cognitive/Behavioral Screening of Mice: For Genetics, Pharmacology, Animal Cognition and Undergraduate Instruction

Published on: February 26, 2014

Finding the right motivation: genotype-dependent differences in effective reinforcements for spatial learning.

Jiun Youn1, Bart A Ellenbroek, Inti van Eck

  • 1Behavioral Neuroscience Group, Center for Neurogenomics and Cognitive Research and Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam, VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Behavioural Brain Research
|October 6, 2011
PubMed
Summary

Motivational factors significantly impact mouse spatial memory. DBA/2J mice show impaired learning with aversive rewards but perform comparably to C57BL/6J mice with appetitive rewards, highlighting the need for tailored experimental designs.

More Related Videos

Analyzing Spatial Learning and Prosocial Behavior in Mice Using the Barnes Maze and Damsel-in-Distress Paradigms
08:00

Analyzing Spatial Learning and Prosocial Behavior in Mice Using the Barnes Maze and Damsel-in-Distress Paradigms

Published on: November 17, 2018

An Open-Source Virtual Reality System for the Measurement of Spatial Learning in Head-Restrained Mice
08:59

An Open-Source Virtual Reality System for the Measurement of Spatial Learning in Head-Restrained Mice

Published on: March 3, 2023

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 28, 2026

Automated, Quantitative Cognitive/Behavioral Screening of Mice: For Genetics, Pharmacology, Animal Cognition and Undergraduate Instruction
16:23

Automated, Quantitative Cognitive/Behavioral Screening of Mice: For Genetics, Pharmacology, Animal Cognition and Undergraduate Instruction

Published on: February 26, 2014

Analyzing Spatial Learning and Prosocial Behavior in Mice Using the Barnes Maze and Damsel-in-Distress Paradigms
08:00

Analyzing Spatial Learning and Prosocial Behavior in Mice Using the Barnes Maze and Damsel-in-Distress Paradigms

Published on: November 17, 2018

An Open-Source Virtual Reality System for the Measurement of Spatial Learning in Head-Restrained Mice
08:59

An Open-Source Virtual Reality System for the Measurement of Spatial Learning in Head-Restrained Mice

Published on: March 3, 2023

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Behavioral Science
  • Genetics

Background:

  • DBA/2J mice exhibit memory deficits in some tests, but perform well in others involving food rewards.
  • Motivational factors may differentially influence cognitive performance across mouse strains.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the impact of motivational factors on spatial memory in DBA/2J and C57BL/6J mice using a modified Barnes maze.
  • To compare the performance of these strains under aversive versus appetitive reinforcement conditions.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized a modified Barnes maze (mBM) with identical spatial cues and motor demands, allowing for both aversive and appetitive reinforcement.
  • Assessed spatial learning acquisition and strategy use in DBA/2J and C57BL/6J mice under both reinforcement conditions.

Main Results:

  • Both mouse strains learned spatial tasks in the mBM regardless of reinforcement type.
  • DBA/2J mice learned slower than C57BL/6J mice with aversive reinforcement, but performed equally with appetitive reinforcement.
  • C57BL/6J mice predominantly used spatial strategies with aversive rewards, while both strains used them similarly with appetitive rewards.

Conclusions:

  • Cognitive performance in mice is highly dependent on motivational factors.
  • The choice of reinforcement in behavioral tests critically influences observed spatial memory capabilities, particularly in DBA/2J mice.
  • Findings challenge interpretations of inherent hippocampal dysfunction in DBA/2J mice based solely on aversive reward-based tests.