Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Decision Making

Decision Making

Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...

Decision Making: P-value Method

Decision Making: P-value Method

The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can have a...

Ethical Dilemmas I

Ethical Dilemmas I

Ethical dilemmas in nursing are of utmost importance, as they often arise from the tension between adhering to core ethical principles and the practical realities of healthcare delivery. These dilemmas require nurses to navigate complex situations where competing ethical considerations pull them in different directions.
Let us explore some examples to understand the potentially complex moral decisions nurses face.
Take the case of caring for minors, particularly in areas related to reproductive...

Critical Thinking II

Critical Thinking II

Critical thinking is a cognitive process with several attributes. The attributes of critical thinking include the following:

Ethical Dilemmas II

Ethical Dilemmas II

Resolving an ethical dilemma in healthcare involves a systematic approach that considers every aspect of the issue, respecting both the patient's needs and values and the healthcare professional's ethical obligations. Here are potential steps to resolve an ethical dilemma:

Patient-centered Care

Patient-centered Care

Patient-centered care involves delivering care beyond inpatient hospitalization. Reflective practice can enhance a patient-centered approach. Reflective practice is a process of reasoning that considers all aspects of the present situation, including practicalities, learning from personal practice, and consideration of patient needs. Patients appreciate care decisions made while considering their input. Involving the patient in their care provides the patient with a sense of contribution rather...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Nasal steroids, irrigation, oral antibiotics, and subgroup targeting for effective management of acute sinusitis (NOSES): Protocol for a comparative effectiveness randomized controlled trial.

PloS one·2026

Same author

Symptoms Associated With Detection of Viral Versus Bacterial Pathogens in Outpatients With Lower Respiratory Infections.

Influenza and other respiratory viruses·2026

Same author

Catastrophizing contributes to the association between posttraumatic stress symptoms and pain outcomes in individuals with chronic low back pain: Differential effects as a function of sex.

The journal of pain·2026

Same author

External validation of risk scores and multivariate models for the diagnosis of community-acquired pneumonia in outpatients.

The European journal of general practice·2026

Same author

Autonomic indices of negative emotion regulation predict treatment response in opioid-treated chronic low back pain.

The journal of pain·2026

Same author

Demographics in distress: a national study of burnout and well-being of resident physicians in high-burnout specialties.

BMC medical education·2026

Same journal

Impact of Health Insurance Coverage on Diabetes Care Quality: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Racial, Ethnic, and Gender Disparities in U.S. Adults with Type 2 Diabetes.

Journal of general internal medicine·2026

Same journal

Assessment of Physician Advocacy Engagement: A Scoping Review and Proposal of an Assessment Tool.

Journal of general internal medicine·2026

Same journal

Relative Burden of Social Determinants of Health on Diverse Populations of Health Resources and Services Administration Health Centers.

Journal of general internal medicine·2026

Same journal

Addressing Moral Distress Among Gender-Affirming Healthcare Professionals.

Journal of general internal medicine·2026

Same journal

Trainee-Led Patient Education to Increase Advance Care Planning in a Geriatric Primary Care Clinic.

Journal of general internal medicine·2026

Same journal

Scholarly Outcomes of a Small Projects Grant Program.

Journal of general internal medicine·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

Evidence, values, guidelines and rational decision-making.

Bruce Barrett¹

¹Department of Family Medicine, University of Wisconsin, 1100 Delaplaine Ct., Madison, WI, USA. bruce.barrett@fammed.wisc.edu

Journal of General Internal Medicine

|October 6, 2011

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Standardized medical guidelines are often irrational and unethical, overriding patient autonomy. Individualized decision-making, respecting patient choice, is crucial for weighing potential benefits against harms in medical choices.

Related Experiment Videos

Area of Science:

Medical Ethics
Health Policy
Decision Analysis

Background:

Medical decisions involve choices with potential benefits and harms, varying in likelihood and magnitude.
Randomized controlled trials provide data on event occurrence and magnitude.
No universal method exists for weighing harms against benefits.

Purpose of the Study:

Critique the universal implementation of standardized medical guidelines.
Advocate for individualized medical decision-making based on patient autonomy.
Examine the ethical and rational implications of guideline adherence versus patient choice.

Main Methods:

Ethical analysis of medical decision-making principles.
Review of the role of autonomy in patient care.
Case study analysis of cancer screening and diabetes management guidelines.

Main Results:

Universal guidelines are deemed irrational due to implicit benefit overvaluation and unethical by removing patient autonomy.
Standardized guidelines prioritize physician or system decisions over individual patient informed choice.
The practice disregards the individualized nature of medical decision-making.

Conclusions:

Standardized medical guidelines conflict with the ethical principle of patient autonomy.
Individualized decision-making is essential for ethically navigating medical choices.
Practices like cancer screening and diabetes management require a shift towards patient-centered choices over rigid guidelines.