[Epidemiology of the avoidable delay in patients with acute myocardial infarct admitted to the coronary care unit]
C Fresco1, A P Maggioni, M G Franzosi
1Istituto di Ricerche Cliniche Applicate e di Base, Udine.
Insights
Patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) often delay hospital arrival, missing crucial treatment windows. Decision delay, not transport time, is the primary cause, highlighting a need for public awareness and improved pre-hospital care strategies.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Public Health
Context:
- Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) treatment is time-sensitive.
- Despite effective therapies, few patients receive timely hospital care for AMI.
Purpose:
- To review literature on factors contributing to pre-hospital delay in AMI patients.
- To identify delay-promoting issues and compare international and Italian data.
Summary:
- Median total delay for AMI patients is 3-5 hours, largely due to decision delay (onset of symptoms to first medical contact).
- Transportation time has minimal impact; mobile coronary units significantly reduce thrombolysis time.
- Factors determining delay show contrasting results across studies.
Impact:
- Highlights the critical need to address patient decision delay in AMI management.
- Suggests mobile coronary units and public awareness campaigns as potential strategies to improve AMI outcomes.
Abstract:
Despite the availability of safe and effective drugs for the treatment of acute myocardial infarction, nowadays, only a minority of patients arrive at the hospital early enough to receive the benefit of these treatments. The reason for this is still uncertain. Our intention was to review the literature on this topic, check if there were some issues that could be identified as delay-promoters, and see if any Italian data were available, in order to make a comparison with international data. We found a substantial agreement among the Authors that median total delay (i.e. the time between the onset of symptoms and the arrival at the hospital) is between three and five hours, and it seems that this has remained fairly stable over the years. The decision delay (i.e. the time between the onset of symptoms and the first medical contact) is almost unanimously indicated as the major single component in the total delay. This represents around 40% of the pre-hospital phase. Transportation time appears to play only a slight role, if indeed any, in the total delay. Nonetheless, mobile coronary units have consistently shown that they can reduce thrombolysis time (e.g. the time between the onset of symptoms and the start of thrombolytic infusion) by almost 60 minutes, and this time-gain is comparable with the reduction in total delay obtained in Sweden with a media campaign. Strongly contrasting results were obtained from the analysis of the delay-determining factors.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
More Related Videos
05:41Left Anterior Descending Coronary Artery Ligation for Ischemia-Reperfusion Research: Model Improvement via Technical Modifications and Quality Control
Published on: December 16, 2022
06:16Signal Acquisition, Score Interpretation, and Economics of a Non-Invasive Point-of-Care Test for Coronary Artery Disease
Published on: August 9, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Coronary Artery Disease IV: Preventive Measures
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction
Acute Coronary Syndrome II: Pathophysiology and Clinical Manifestations
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome V: Nursing Management
