Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Algorithms for Numerical Problem Solving01:29

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Algorithms for Numerical Problem Solving

Mechanistic models play a crucial role in algorithms for numerical problem-solving, particularly in nonlinear mixed effects modeling (NMEM). These models aim to minimize specific objective functions by evaluating various parameter estimates, leading to the development of systematic algorithms. In some cases, linearization techniques approximate the model using linear equations.
In individual population analyses, different algorithms are employed, such as Cauchy's method, which uses a...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Cortical similarity networks in the rat brain: Postnatal development and sensitivity to early life stress.

Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026
Same author

Go Figure: Transparency in neuroscience images preserves context and clarifies interpretation.

ArXiv·2025
Same author

The brain cortical similarity network: Development and sensitivity to early life stress in a rat model.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2025
Same author

Processing, evaluating, and understanding FMRI data with afni_proc.py.

Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)·2024
Same author

Processing, evaluating and understanding FMRI data with afni_proc.py.

ArXiv·2024
Same author

A diffusion tensor imaging white matter atlas of the domestic canine brain.

Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 28, 2026

Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data
06:35

Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data

Published on: July 24, 2010

Vector autoregression, structural equation modeling, and their synthesis in neuroimaging data analysis.

Gang Chen1, Daniel R Glen, Ziad S Saad

  • 1Scientific and Statistical Computing Core, NIMH/NIH/HHS, USA. gangchen@mail.nih.gov

Computers in Biology and Medicine
|October 7, 2011
PubMed
Summary

Vector autoregression (VAR) and structural equation modeling (SEM) are brain network analysis tools. A unified structural vector autoregression (SVAR) model combines both, enhancing statistical power for fMRI data analysis.

More Related Videos

Identification of Disease-related Spatial Covariance Patterns using Neuroimaging Data
14:27

Identification of Disease-related Spatial Covariance Patterns using Neuroimaging Data

Published on: June 26, 2013

Co-analysis of Brain Structure and Function using fMRI and Diffusion-weighted Imaging
17:06

Co-analysis of Brain Structure and Function using fMRI and Diffusion-weighted Imaging

Published on: November 8, 2012

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 28, 2026

Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data
06:35

Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data

Published on: July 24, 2010

Identification of Disease-related Spatial Covariance Patterns using Neuroimaging Data
14:27

Identification of Disease-related Spatial Covariance Patterns using Neuroimaging Data

Published on: June 26, 2013

Co-analysis of Brain Structure and Function using fMRI and Diffusion-weighted Imaging
17:06

Co-analysis of Brain Structure and Function using fMRI and Diffusion-weighted Imaging

Published on: November 8, 2012

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Computational Neuroscience
  • Brain Network Analysis

Background:

  • Vector Autoregression (VAR) models time-lagged influences between brain regions.
  • Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) models contemporaneous interactions, validating existing hypotheses.
  • Both VAR and SEM are widely used for brain network modeling, particularly with fMRI data.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To detail VAR and SEM models, discussing their application and limitations in fMRI.
  • To propose a unified model, structural vector autoregression (SVAR), integrating both lagged and contemporaneous effects.
  • To enhance statistical and explanatory power in brain network analysis.

Main Methods:

  • Detailed presentation of Vector Autoregression (VAR) for data-driven analysis.
  • Detailed presentation of Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) for hypothesis-driven analysis.
  • Introduction and explanation of the unified Structural Vector Autoregression (SVAR) model.

Main Results:

  • VAR captures time-lagged connectivity; SEM captures contemporaneous connectivity.
  • The proposed SVAR model integrates both lagged and contemporaneous effects.
  • SVAR offers potential improvements in statistical and explanatory power over separate VAR and SEM analyses.

Conclusions:

  • The unified SVAR model provides a comprehensive approach to brain network modeling.
  • SVAR can overcome limitations inherent in using VAR and SEM independently.
  • This integrated approach may lead to more robust findings in fMRI connectivity studies.