Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 28, 2026

Assessment of Respiratory Function in Conscious Mice by Double-chamber Plethysmography
Published on: July 10, 2018
The interest of FEF(25-75) in evaluating bronchial hyperresponsiveness with the methacholine test
F Muñoz-López1, M Ríos-Alcolea
1Pediatric Immunoallergology Center. Former Chief of Pediatric Immunoalergology Service, Clínic Hospital - Sant Joan de Déu. Hospital. Faculty of Medicine. University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain. 5314fml@comb.cat
Background:
Bronchial hyperresponsiveness is the pathogenic basis of asthma, and measurement of its intensity is investigated using the methacholine provocation test, which not only and particularly evaluates the reduction in FEV1 (PD20) but also takes forced mid-expiratory flow or FEF(25-75) (PD40) into account. The present study aims to evaluate the usefulness of both parameters.
Material And Methods:
Provocation testing was carried out in 151 patients between 7 and 22 years of age diagnosed with asthma, tracheobronchitis and/or rhinitis, using a short method that allows quantification of the methacholine administered. The subjects were divided into three groups according to the amount of methacholine needed to obtain the mentioned parameters (group 1: ≤1000μg; group 2: 1001-2000μg; group 3: ≥2001μg).
Results:
Greater variability was recorded for FEF(25-75) than for FEV1. Paired comparison among the three groups for FEV1 proved significant, in the same way as for FEF(25-75) between groups 2 and 3, and 1 and 3, but not between groups 1 and 2. Calculation was made of the amount of methacholine required to obtain PD20 and PD40 from the same dose. Only the significant differences corresponded to the comparison of group 1 versus the rest, with no differences between the means of the total mean values.
Conclusions:
The utility of PD20 is more evident, considering the variability of PD40; the latter may be useful in patients with rhinitis or tracheobronchitis when PD20 proves scantly demonstrative.
Related Concept Videos
Pulmonary Function Tests
Pulmonary Function Tests are crucial diagnostic tools for assessing respiratory function, particularly in patients with chronic respiratory disorders. They comprehensively evaluate lung volumes, ventilatory function, breathing mechanics, diffusion, and gas exchange. These tests help diagnose pulmonary diseases and play a significant role in monitoring disease progression, evaluating disability, and assessing response to therapy.
PFTs involve using a spirometer, a...
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease-IV: Assessement and Diagnostic Studies
Medical History
Physical Assessment of the Respiratory Tract II: Palpation
Thoracic Palpation
Thoracic palpation detects tenderness, masses, lesions, respiratory excursions, and vocal fremitus. The nurse assesses...
Asthma-IV: Diagnostic and Management
Clinical Assessment for Asthma:
This is the first step in diagnosing and managing asthma. It includes:

