Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding01:25

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies01:27

Confounding in Epidemiological Studies

Confounding in statistical epidemiology represents a pivotal challenge, referring to the distortion in the perceived relationship between an exposure and an outcome due to the presence of a third variable, known as a confounder. This variable is associated with both the exposure and the outcome but is not a direct link in their causal chain. Its presence can lead to erroneous interpretations of the exposure's effect, either exaggerating or underestimating the true association. This phenomenon...
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis01:23

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis

Mechanistic models are utilized in individual analysis using single-source data, but imperfections arise due to data collection errors, preventing perfect prediction of observed data. The mathematical equation involves known values (Xi), observed concentrations (Ci), measurement errors (εi), model parameters (ϕj), and the related function (ƒi) for i number of values. Different least-squares metrics quantify differences between predicted and observed values. The ordinary least squares (OLS)...
Assumptions of Survival Analysis01:15

Assumptions of Survival Analysis

Survival models analyze the time until one or more events occur, such as death in biological organisms or failure in mechanical systems. These models are widely used across fields like medicine, biology, engineering, and public health to study time-to-event phenomena. To ensure accurate results, survival analysis relies on key assumptions and careful study design.
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups01:20

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and Cox...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Development of a Biology-Informed Chemical Mixture Index for Oxidative Stress and Mortality in NHANES 2005-2010: A Survey-Weighted Quantile G-Computation Approach.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2026
Same author

Outcome and Exposure Polygenic Risk Scores Can Help Reduce Information Bias and Selection Bias in Regression Estimates From Biobank Data.

Genetic epidemiology·2026
Same author

Maternal inflammation and oxidative stress during pregnancy and emotional-behavioral problems in children aged 1.5-3 years: A longitudinal repeated-measures study.

Journal of affective disorders·2026
Same author

Privacy-enhancing sequential learning under heterogeneous selection bias in multi-site electronic health records data.

Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA·2026
Same author

Evaluation of integrated, multimedia biomarkers of prenatal metals exposure in association with child neurodevelopment in Puerto Rico.

Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology·2026
Same author

Prenatal phthalate exposure and emotional-behavioral problems in children aged 1.5 to 3 years from the PROTECT birth cohort.

Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology·2026

Related Experiment Videos

Sensitivity analysis for interactions under unmeasured confounding.

Tyler J Vanderweele1, Bhramar Mukherjee, Jinbo Chen

  • 1Department of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, USA. tvanderw@hsph.harvard.edu2552

Statistics in Medicine
|October 7, 2011
PubMed
Summary

This study introduces a new sensitivity analysis to evaluate how unmeasured confounding affects interaction analyses. It provides formulas showing that if independent exposures show a nonzero interaction, a true interaction or confounding-induced interaction is present.

Related Experiment Videos

Area of Science:

  • Epidemiology
  • Biostatistics
  • Statistical modeling

Background:

  • Unmeasured confounding poses a significant challenge in observational studies, potentially biasing estimates of effect modification (interaction).
  • Assessing the robustness of interaction findings to unmeasured confounding is crucial for valid scientific conclusions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a sensitivity analysis technique for quantifying the impact of unmeasured confounding on interaction analyses.
  • To provide bias formulas for assessing interaction under unmeasured confounding on both additive and multiplicative scales.

Main Methods:

  • Derivation of bias formulas for sensitivity analysis of interaction under unmeasured confounding.
  • Development of simplified formulas for scenarios where one exposure does not interact with the unmeasured confounder.
  • Application of the developed methods to real-world examples from scientific literature.

Main Results:

  • Formulas are provided to quantify bias in interaction estimates due to unmeasured confounding.
  • A key finding indicates that for independent exposures, a nonzero interaction estimate implies either a true interaction or an interaction involving the unmeasured confounder.
  • The technique is demonstrated through practical examples, illustrating its utility.

Conclusions:

  • The developed sensitivity analysis technique allows researchers to assess the potential impact of unmeasured confounding on interaction findings.
  • The results offer a framework for interpreting interaction estimates in the presence of unmeasured confounding.
  • This work enhances the reliability of interaction analyses in epidemiological and other research fields.