Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

What is Biodiversity?01:19

What is Biodiversity?

Biodiversity describes the variety of living things at multiple organizational levels: genetic, species and ecosystem diversity. Species diversity includes all branches of the evolutionary tree from single-celled prokaryotic organisms, bacteria, and archaea, to the eukaryotic kingdoms: plants; animals; fungi; and protists. To date, there have been about 1.75 million species identified, and new species are discovered every week.
The Evidence for Evolution02:55

The Evidence for Evolution

Genetic variations accumulating within populations over generations give rise to biological evolution. Evolutionary changes can result in the formation of novel varieties and entire new species. These changes are responsible for the diverse forms of life inhabiting the planet. The evidence for evolution suggests that all living organisms descended from common ancestors.
Distribution and Dispersion00:54

Distribution and Dispersion

To understand intra-specific interactions in populations, scientists measure the spatial arrangement of species individuals. This geographic arrangement is known as the species distribution or dispersion. Highly territorial species exhibit a uniform distribution pattern, in which individuals are spaced at relatively equal distances from one another. Species that are highly tied to particular resources, such as food or shelter, tend to concentrate around those resources, and thus exhibit a...
Mutation, Gene Flow, and Genetic Drift01:09

Mutation, Gene Flow, and Genetic Drift

In a population that is not at Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium, the frequency of alleles changes over time. Therefore, any deviations from the five conditions of Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium can alter the genetic variation of a given population. Conditions that change the genetic variability of a population include mutations, natural selection, non-random mating, gene flow, and genetic drift (small population size).
Speciation Rates01:07

Speciation Rates

Overview
What is a Species?01:17

What is a Species?

Overview

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Legacies of foundation species shape life after death.

Science advances·2026
Same author

Deforestation and human proximity influence Trypanosoma cruzi infection in palm-dwelling triatomines.

PloS one·2026
Same author

Despite rapid warming, seed production is not leading poleward migration in North American and European forests.

The New phytologist·2026
Same author

Human occupation, not forest structure, determines sand fly abundance in the Amazon.

Parasites & vectors·2026
Same author

Pre-existing particle composition controls the initial viscosity and aging of α-pinene-derived secondary organic aerosol.

Environmental science: atmospheres·2026
Same author

Continental Contrasts in Climate Extremes That Control Tree Fecundity.

Global change biology·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 28, 2026

Modeling the Size Spectrum for Macroinvertebrates and Fishes in Stream Ecosystems
07:41

Modeling the Size Spectrum for Macroinvertebrates and Fishes in Stream Ecosystems

Published on: July 30, 2019

Individual-scale variation, species-scale differences: inference needed to understand diversity.

James S Clark1, David M Bell, Michelle H Hersh

  • 1Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA. jimclark@duke.edu

Ecology Letters
|October 8, 2011
PubMed
Summary

Ecological data analysis often aggregates individual responses, masking crucial process-level variation. Disaggregating data reveals true ecological patterns and resolves controversial interpretations in species interactions and diversity.

More Related Videos

A Concoction Pipeline for Generating Molecular Operational Taxonomic Units (MOTUs) Among Riparian and Aquatic Beetles
10:23

A Concoction Pipeline for Generating Molecular Operational Taxonomic Units (MOTUs) Among Riparian and Aquatic Beetles

Published on: July 11, 2025

Experimental Protocol for Manipulating Plant-induced Soil Heterogeneity
08:16

Experimental Protocol for Manipulating Plant-induced Soil Heterogeneity

Published on: March 13, 2014

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 28, 2026

Modeling the Size Spectrum for Macroinvertebrates and Fishes in Stream Ecosystems
07:41

Modeling the Size Spectrum for Macroinvertebrates and Fishes in Stream Ecosystems

Published on: July 30, 2019

A Concoction Pipeline for Generating Molecular Operational Taxonomic Units (MOTUs) Among Riparian and Aquatic Beetles
10:23

A Concoction Pipeline for Generating Molecular Operational Taxonomic Units (MOTUs) Among Riparian and Aquatic Beetles

Published on: July 11, 2025

Experimental Protocol for Manipulating Plant-induced Soil Heterogeneity
08:16

Experimental Protocol for Manipulating Plant-induced Soil Heterogeneity

Published on: March 13, 2014

Area of Science:

  • Ecology
  • Ecological modeling
  • Population dynamics

Background:

  • Ecological data analysis frequently uses aggregated species-level averages, obscuring individual responses to environmental variation and competition.
  • This aggregation can lead to misleading interpretations, making species appear similar and hiding important ecological processes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify and explain the problems caused by data aggregation in ecological studies.
  • To demonstrate how disaggregation to the individual level reveals hidden ecological patterns and resolves controversies.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of ecological data aggregation and its impact on interpretation.
  • Demonstration of how disaggregating species-level data to the individual level can reveal significant ecological insights.
  • Identification of specific analytical pitfalls arising from aggregation.

Main Results:

  • Aggregation obscures individual-level variation, leading to inaccurate conclusions about species differences and interactions.
  • Disaggregation reveals that individual variation is crucial for understanding diversity and niche differentiation.
  • Standard analyses can produce paradoxical results, such as predicting a decrease in a species' abundance when a competitor is removed.

Conclusions:

  • Data aggregation is a significant problem in ecology, leading to misleading interpretations and hindering accurate ecological understanding.
  • Disaggregating data to the individual level is essential for resolving ecological controversies and improving model accuracy.
  • The study proposes methods to identify and address aggregation issues in ecological research.