Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 28, 2026
Combination of High Ligation and Intraoperative Embolization Using Polidocanol for Treatment of Varicoceles
Published on: December 22, 2023
Diathermy excisional hemorrhoidectomy: a prospective randomized study comparing pedicle ligation and pedicle
1Department of General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Alexandria, Alexandria, Egypt. samerbessa@gmail.com
Background:
In hemorrhoidectomy, pedicle coagulation has been claimed to be associated with less postoperative pain compared with pedicle ligation.
Objective:
This study was designed to compare the effects of pedicle ligation vs pedicle coagulation on postoperative pain in patients undergoing diathermy excisional hemorrhoidectomy.
Design:
The study was conducted as a single-blind prospective randomized clinical trial.
Setting:
Patients were treated at a single tertiary-level teaching hospital (Main University Hospital) in Alexandria, Egypt, from February 2009 to October 2010.
Patients:
Patients with symptomatic grade III or IV hemorrhoids were eligible.
Intervention:
Patients were randomly allocated to receive either pedicle coagulation or pedicle ligation during 3-quadrant diathermy excision hemorrhoidectomy.
Main Outcome Measures:
Patients reported postoperative pain daily on a visual analog scale (0-10, with 10 corresponding to the most severe pain) during the first 10 postoperative days. On-demand parenteral analgesic requirements were recorded during the first 24 hours after surgery. Operative time, postoperative complications, and wound healing rates at 6 weeks postoperatively were also recorded.
Limitations:
No a priori power calculation could be performed, so it was not possible to tell whether nonsignificant differences were real or a result of chance.
Results:
A total of 136 patients were randomly assigned, and 120 patients completed the study (60 in each group). The overall median pain score for the first 10 postoperative days was significantly lower in the pedicle coagulation group than in the pedicle ligation group (4.65 vs 6.56, P < .001), and daily median pain scores were significantly lower for pedicle coagulation than for pedicle ligation throughout the first 6 postoperative days (P < .001). Postoperative pain scores followed different courses in the 2 groups. In the coagulation group, pain levels were lowest during the first 3 postoperative days, increasing from day 4 and then falling after day 8. In the ligation group, pain levels were highest during the first 4 postoperative days, then gradually decreased. The median number of analgesic ampoules required during the first 24 hours was also significantly lower for pedicle coagulation than for ligation: 1 (range, 0-3) vs 3 (range, 1-3); P < .001). The median operative time was 15 (range, 14-20) minutes with coagulation and 14.5 (range, 12-18) minutes with ligation (P < .001). No significant differences were observed in the incidence of postoperative complications or wound healing rates at 6 weeks postoperatively. No anal stenoses or recurrences were observed.
Conclusions:
Pedicle coagulation is safe and provides a superior alternative to pedicle ligation by decreasing postoperative pain in the first 6 postoperative days, as well as reducing parenteral analgesic requirements during the first 24 hours postoperatively.
