Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 28, 2026
07:24
Autologous Microfractured and Purified Adipose Tissue for Arthroscopic Management of Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus
Published on: January 23, 2018
Arthroscopy for treating temporomandibular joint disorders.
1NHS Ayrshire and Arran, UK.
Evidence-Based Dentistry
|October 8, 2011
Summary
Arthroscopy and nonsurgical treatments effectively reduced temporomandibular disorder (TMD) pain at six months. Open surgery showed greater pain reduction than arthroscopy at 12 months, with no significant differences in other clinical outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Oral Health
- Surgical Innovation
- Clinical Trials
Background:
- Temporomandibular disorders (TMDs) represent a complex group of conditions affecting the temporomandibular joint and masticatory muscles.
- Evaluating the efficacy of arthroscopic surgery for TMDs is crucial for guiding treatment decisions.
- This review synthesizes evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing arthroscopy with other interventions for TMDs.
Discussion:
- Seven RCTs involving 349 patients were included, with all studies exhibiting high or unclear risk of bias.
- Arthroscopy and nonsurgical treatments demonstrated comparable pain reduction at six months.
- Open surgery proved more effective than arthroscopy in reducing pain at 12 months, though other clinical outcomes showed no significant differences.
Key Insights:
- Arthroscopy significantly improved maximum interincisal opening compared to arthrocentesis at 12 months.
- No statistically significant differences were observed in pain levels between arthroscopy and arthrocentesis at 12 months.
- Open surgery showed a statistically significant advantage over arthroscopy in pain reduction at 12 months.
Outlook:
- Further high-quality RCTs are needed to clarify the long-term efficacy and safety of arthroscopic procedures for TMDs.
- Investigating patient-reported outcome measures alongside objective clinical findings is essential for a comprehensive assessment.
- Comparative effectiveness research focusing on different surgical techniques and nonsurgical management strategies for TMDs is warranted.
Related Concept Videos
01:09Functional Classification of Joints
Functional Classification of Joints
The functional classification of joints is determined by the amount of mobility between the adjacent bones. Joints are functionally classified as a synarthrosis or immobile joint, an amphiarthrosis or slightly moveable joint, or as a diarthrosis, a freely moveable joint. Fibrous and cartilaginous joints can be functionally classified as either synarthroses or amphiarthroses, whereas all synovial joints are classified as diarthroses.
Synarthrosis
An immobile...
The functional classification of joints is determined by the amount of mobility between the adjacent bones. Joints are functionally classified as a synarthrosis or immobile joint, an amphiarthrosis or slightly moveable joint, or as a diarthrosis, a freely moveable joint. Fibrous and cartilaginous joints can be functionally classified as either synarthroses or amphiarthroses, whereas all synovial joints are classified as diarthroses.
Synarthrosis
An immobile...
01:16Structural Joints: Synovial Joints
Synovial joints are the most common type of joint in the body. A key structural characteristic for a synovial joint is the presence of a joint cavity. This fluid-filled space is where the articulating surfaces of the bones contact each other. Also, unlike fibrous or cartilaginous joints, the articulating bone surfaces at a synovial joint are not directly connected to each other with fibrous connective tissue or cartilage. This gives the bones of a synovial joint the ability to move smoothly...