Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 28, 2026

Differential Effects of Lipid-lowering Drugs in Modulating Morphology of Cholesterol Particles
Published on: November 10, 2017
Cost-effectiveness of optimizing use of statins in Australia: using outpatient data from the REACH Registry
Zanfina Ademi1, Christopher M Reid, Bruce Hollingsworth
1Melbourne EpiCentre, Department of Medicine (RMH), University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia. zademi@unimelb.edu.au
Insights
Maximizing statin coverage for coronary artery disease (CAD) secondary prevention in Australia is cost-effective. Closing the treatment gap with generic statins offers significant health benefits at an incremental cost of $29,717 per life-year gained.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Disease Research
- Health Economics
- Pharmacotherapy Efficacy
Background:
- Cost-effectiveness data for cardiovascular disease interventions are scarce.
- Population-based registries offer realistic insights into clinical practice and long-term outcomes.
- Effective management of cardiovascular disease necessitates understanding intervention costs.
Purpose of the Study:
- To estimate the cost-effectiveness of increasing statin use in secondary prevention of coronary artery disease (CAD) in Australia.
- To quantify the economic benefits of closing the statin treatment gap.
Main Methods:
- A Markov decision analysis model with yearly cycles was employed.
- Data from the Australian Reduction of Atherothrombosis for Continued Health Registry informed the model.
- The model compared current (82%) versus 100% statin coverage for CAD secondary prevention.
Main Results:
- Increasing statin coverage by 18% with generic statins yielded 0.018 discounted life-years gained per person over 5 years.
- The incremental cost was $546 discounted per person.
- The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was $29,717 per life-year gained.
Conclusions:
- Maximizing statin coverage for CAD patients is a cost-effective secondary prevention strategy.
- Adherence to evidence-based statin recommendations improves patient outcomes.
- Closing the statin treatment gap enhances cardiovascular disease management.
Background:
Although few cardiovascular registries report the costs of illness or cost-effectiveness of health interventions, such information is critical to inform the effective and cost-effective management of cardiovascular disease, particularly if drawn from population-based registries, which more accurately reflect clinical practice and follow up patients for much longer than clinical trials.
Objective:
The goal of this study was to estimate the cost-effectiveness of closing the statin "treatment gap" in the secondary prevention of coronary artery disease (CAD) in Australia.
Methods:
A decision analysis Markov model was developed with yearly cycles and the health states of alive or dead. Using data from the Australian Reduction of Atherothrombosis for Continued Health Registry, the model compared current statin coverage (82%) in the secondary prevention of CAD (the current group) with a hypothetical situation of 100% coverage (the improved group). The 18% gap was filled with use of generic statins. Data from a recent meta-analysis were used to estimate the benefits of statin use in terms of reducing recurrent cardiovascular events and death. Government reimbursement data from 2011 were used to calculate direct health care costs. The cost of the intervention to improve statin coverage was assumed to be $250 per person. Years of life lived and costs were discounted at 5% annually. All values are given in Australian dollars.
Results:
Among the 2058 subjects in the current group, the model estimated that there would be 106 nonfatal myocardial infractions, 68 nonfatal strokes, and 275 deaths over 5 years. In the improved group, all of whom took statins, the corresponding numbers were 101, 65, and 259, equating to numbers needed to treat of 426, 639, and 127, respectively. Over the 5 years, there would be 0.018 life-years gained (discounted) at a net cost of $546 (discounted) per person. These equated to an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $29,717 per life-year gained.
Conclusion:
The results suggest that for patients with CAD, maximizing coverage with statins, in line with evidence-based recommendations, represents a cost-effective means of secondary prevention.
Related Concept Videos
Lipid-Lowering Drugs: Statins and Miscellaneous Agents
Atherosclerosis III: Management
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Pharmacogenomics: Identification of New Drug Targets
Coronary Artery Disease IV: Preventive Measures
Drug Dosing: Obese Patients