Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 28, 2026

Gene Regulation and Targeted Therapy in Gastric Cancer Peritoneal Metastasis: Radiological Findings from Dual Energy CT and PET/CT
Published on: January 22, 2018
Cost-effectiveness of routine (18)F-FDG PET/CT in high-risk patients with gram-positive bacteremia
Fidel J Vos1, Chantal P Bleeker-Rovers, Bart Jan Kullberg
1Department of Internal Medicine, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. f.vos@aig.umcn.nl
Unlabelled:
Gram-positive bacteremia has a high morbidity and mortality rate of approximately 30%. Delayed diagnosis of clinically silent metastatic infectious foci is an important indicator for a complicated outcome. (18)F-FDG PET/CT allows detection of focal infection, resulting in lower relapse rates and mortality. Here, we present a cost-effectiveness analysis associated with introduction of (18)F-FDG PET/CT for patients with gram-positive bacteremia.
Methods:
A cost-effectiveness analysis in a prospective (18)F-FDG PET/CT group (n = 115) and matched control group (n = 230) was performed alongside a clinical study, the results of which were previously published. Mortality at 6 mo was considered the final effect outcome and was used in the denominator of the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio.
Results:
Mortality in the (18)F-FDG PET/CT group was 19%, compared with 32% in the control group (P < 0.01). Incremental costs of (18)F-FDG PET/CT were $9,454 (95% confidence interval [CI], $3,963-$14,947), mainly because of admission (mean, $6,631; 95% CI, $1,449-$11,814). Additional costs were related to echocardiography (P < 0.01), not to (18)F-FDG PET/CT (P = 0.8). The mean incremental costs of the (18)F-FDG PET/CT strategy estimated by stratification for endocarditis were $5,277 per patient (95% CI, $429-$10,123; P = 0.03). The point estimate of the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio is $72,487 per prevented death (95% CI, $11,388-$323,379).
Conclusion:
Introduction of a diagnostic regimen including routine (18)F-FDG PET/CT decreases morbidity and mortality. The cost increase is due to in-hospital treatment of metastatic infectious foci. Costs per prevented death, $72,487, are within the range that is considered to be efficient by Dutch guidelines. Patients with high-risk gram-positive bacteremia therefore should have easy access to (18)F-FDG PET/CT to enable early detection of metastatic infectious disease.
Insights
Routine (18)F-FDG PET/CT imaging for gram-positive bacteremia significantly reduces mortality and relapse rates. This diagnostic approach is cost-effective, with costs per prevented death falling within efficient ranges according to Dutch guidelines.
Area of Science:
- Nuclear Medicine
- Infectious Diseases
- Health Economics
Background:
- Gram-positive bacteremia presents a significant health challenge with high morbidity and mortality rates.
- Delayed diagnosis of metastatic infectious foci is a key factor in poor patient outcomes.
- Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography ((18)F-FDG PET/CT) shows promise in detecting infections, potentially lowering relapse and mortality.
Purpose of the Study:
- To conduct a cost-effectiveness analysis of integrating (18)F-FDG PET/CT into the diagnostic pathway for patients with gram-positive bacteremia.
- To evaluate the impact of (18)F-FDG PET/CT on mortality and healthcare costs in this patient population.
Main Methods:
- A cost-effectiveness analysis was performed alongside a prospective clinical study comparing an (18)F-FDG PET/CT group (n=115) with a matched control group (n=230).
- Mortality at six months was the primary outcome measure for calculating the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio.
- Costs associated with diagnostic procedures and patient management were analyzed.
Main Results:
- Mortality was significantly lower in the (18)F-FDG PET/CT group (19%) compared to the control group (32%) (P < 0.01).
- The incremental cost of the (18)F-FDG PET/CT strategy was $9,454, primarily driven by inpatient admission costs.
- The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was estimated at $72,487 per prevented death, a figure considered efficient by Dutch guidelines.
Conclusions:
- Routine implementation of (18)F-FDG PET/CT in the diagnostic workup for gram-positive bacteremia effectively reduces morbidity and mortality.
- While associated with increased costs, these are largely due to necessary inpatient treatment for metastatic infections.
- (18)F-FDG PET/CT should be readily accessible for high-risk patients to facilitate early detection of metastatic disease.
Related Concept Videos
Radiological Investigation III: Pulmonary Angiogram and PET Scan
Pulmonary Angiogram
A Pulmonary Angiogram is an invasive procedure involving injecting a contrast medium through a catheter threaded into the pulmonary artery or the right side of the heart to visualize the pulmonary vasculature. Computed Tomography (CT) scans have mainly replaced this...
Positron Emission Tomography
One of the main requirements of a PET scan is a positron-emitting radioisotope, which is produced in a cyclotron and then attached to a substance used by the part of the body being...
Imaging Studies II: Positron Emission Tomography and Scintigraphy
Fundamental Principles of PET

