Related Experiment Videos
Two enteric coated microspheres in cystic fibrosis
J Williams1, A MacDonald, P H Weller
1Birmingham Children's Hospital.
Insights
This study compared two pancreatic enzyme replacement therapies, Pancrease and Creon, in children with cystic fibrosis. Results showed no significant differences in fat absorption or symptom improvement between the two treatments.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Gastroenterology
- Cystic Fibrosis Research
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Cystic fibrosis (CF) often leads to pancreatic insufficiency, requiring enzyme replacement therapy.
- Pancreatic enzyme preparations are crucial for managing malabsorption in CF patients.
- Enteric-coated microsphere formulations aim to improve enzyme delivery and efficacy.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the efficacy of two enteric-coated pancreatin microsphere preparations, Pancrease and Creon.
- To evaluate differences in fat absorption, nitrogen excretion, weight change, and symptom scores.
- To determine if Pancrease and Creon are bioequivalent on a capsule-for-capsule basis.
Main Methods:
- A randomized, single-blind, crossover study design was employed.
- Thirty-nine children with cystic fibrosis and pancreatic insufficiency participated.
- Key efficacy measures included coefficient of fat absorption, nitrogen excretion, weight change, and symptom scores over four-week treatment periods for each preparation.
Main Results:
- Data from 27 children were analyzed.
- No statistically significant differences were observed between Pancrease and Creon for any of the measured variables.
- Both preparations demonstrated comparable effects on fat absorption, nitrogen excretion, weight gain, and symptom management.
Conclusions:
- Pancrease and Creon exhibit comparable efficacy when administered on a capsule-for-capsule basis in children with cystic fibrosis.
- The findings suggest no significant clinical advantage of one preparation over the other.
- Further research may explore patient-reported outcomes or long-term efficacy.
Abstract:
In a randomised single blind crossover study in children with cystic fibrosis and pancreatic insufficiency, two enteric coated microsphere preparations of pancreatin were compared on a capsule for capsule basis, by measuring the coefficient of fat absorption, nitrogen excretion, weight change, and symptom scores after four weeks' treatment with each preparation. Thirty nine subjects were randomly allocated to receive Pancrease followed by Creon or vice versa. Each individual subject received the same number of capsules per day in each study period. Data from 27 children (Pancrease/Creon, n = 13 and Creon/Pancrease, n = 14) wer suitable for analysis. Results showed no significant differences between the two preparations in any variable studied. We conclude that there is no significant difference between Pancrease and Creon when compared on a capsule for capsule basis.