Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 28, 2026

Paradigms of Lower Extremity Electrical Stimulation Training After Spinal Cord Injury
08:07

Paradigms of Lower Extremity Electrical Stimulation Training After Spinal Cord Injury

Published on: February 1, 2018

Electric parameters optimization in spinal cord stimulation. Study in conventional nonrechargeable systems.

David Abejón1, Tracy Cameron, Claudio Feler

  • 1Head of Unit Pain, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain. dabejon@telefonica.net

Neuromodulation : Journal of the International Neuromodulation Society
|October 14, 2011
PubMed
Summary

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Feasibility and signal quality of the Minder® implantable continuous EEG monitoring® system compared to 10-20 scalp electrodes over extended monitoring periods.

Epilepsia·2026
Same author

Optimal Information for Chronic Pain (OICP): Delphi Consensus on Patient Assessment and Interventional Techniques.

Journal of pain research·2025
Same author

Epiduroscopy in spinal stenosis. Description of the procedure and safety measures to reduce complications.

Pain management·2025
Same author

How we implement a prehospital transfusion program.

Transfusion·2025
Same author

Consensus Guidelines from the American Society of Pain and Neuroscience for the Use of 60-Day Peripheral Nerve Stimulation Therapy. A NEURON Living Guideline Project.

Journal of pain research·2025
Same author

The UMPIRE study: A first-in-human multicenter trial of bilateral subscalp monitoring for epileptic seizure detection.

Epilepsia·2025

Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) pulse width (Pw) primarily affects stimulation thresholds, not paresthesia coverage. Varying SCS frequency (F) significantly impacts pain relief coverage and paresthesia quality.

Area of Science:

  • Neuromodulation
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Pain Management

Background:

  • Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) devices generate electric fields using parameters like pulse amplitude, pulse width (Pw), and pulse frequency (F).
  • Understanding the influence of these parameters is crucial for optimizing SCS therapy.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the impact of varying SCS stimulus parameters on patient-perceived paresthesia.
  • To determine the relationship between paresthesia perception and pain relief efficacy.

Main Methods:

  • Independently varied Pw (195–300 µsec) and F (10–100 Hz) while maintaining constant electrode polarity.
  • Recorded stimulation thresholds, paresthesia coverage percentage, and subjective quality of paresthesia.
  • Maintained constant frequency (50 Hz) during Pw variation and constant Pw (300 µsec) during F variation.

More Related Videos

Dorsal Column Steerability with Dual Parallel Leads using Dedicated Power Sources: A Computational Model
11:19

Dorsal Column Steerability with Dual Parallel Leads using Dedicated Power Sources: A Computational Model

Published on: February 10, 2011

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 28, 2026

Paradigms of Lower Extremity Electrical Stimulation Training After Spinal Cord Injury
08:07

Paradigms of Lower Extremity Electrical Stimulation Training After Spinal Cord Injury

Published on: February 1, 2018

Dorsal Column Steerability with Dual Parallel Leads using Dedicated Power Sources: A Computational Model
11:19

Dorsal Column Steerability with Dual Parallel Leads using Dedicated Power Sources: A Computational Model

Published on: February 10, 2011

Main Results:

  • Pulse width (Pw) showed a statistically significant correlation with stimulation thresholds but did not significantly alter paresthesia coverage or quality.
  • Frequency (F) did not significantly affect perception thresholds but significantly influenced painful area coverage and paresthesia quality.
  • Therapeutic range differences were statistically significant with Pw variations.

Conclusions:

  • Pulse width (Pw) in typical ranges is best suited for fine-tuning SCS amplitude adjustments.
  • Frequency (F) management offers significant potential for expanding the coverage of the stimulated area in SCS therapy.
  • Optimizing SCS parameters, particularly frequency, can enhance pain relief through improved paresthesia coverage.