Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Optimal Foraging00:48

Optimal Foraging

How animals obtain and eat their food is called foraging behavior. Foraging can include searching for plants and hunting for prey and depends on the species and environment.
Predator-Prey Interactions02:39

Predator-Prey Interactions

Predators consume prey for energy. Predators that acquire prey and prey that avoid predation both increase their chances of survival and reproduction (i.e., fitness). Routine predator-prey interactions elicit mutual adaptations that improve predator offenses, such as claws, teeth, and speed, as well as prey defenses, including crypsis, aposematism, and mimicry. Thus, predator-prey interactions resemble an evolutionary arms race.
Microbial Interactions: Predation01:28

Microbial Interactions: Predation

Microbial predation refers to the process by which one microorganism kills and consumes another to obtain nutrients and energy. It encompasses both bacterial and protozoan predators. This interaction plays a crucial role in shaping microbial communities and regulating nutrient cycling.Bacterial Predators: Epibiotic vs. EndobioticBacterial predators are classified based on their mode of attack as either epibiotic or endobiotic. Epibiotic predators, such as Vampirococcus, attach to the surface of...
Epiphytes, Parasites, and Carnivores02:40

Epiphytes, Parasites, and Carnivores

Plants often form mutualistic relationships with soil-dwelling fungi or bacteria to enhance their roots’ nutrient uptake ability. Root-colonizing fungi (e.g., mycorrhizae) increase a plant’s root surface area, which promotes nutrient absorption. While root-colonizing, nitrogen-fixing bacteria (e.g., rhizobia) convert atmospheric nitrogen (N2) into ammonia (NH3), making nitrogen available to plants for various biological functions. For example, nitrogen is essential for the biosynthesis of the...
Natural Selection and Mating Preferences01:06

Natural Selection and Mating Preferences

The principle of natural selection posits that organisms better adapted to their environment are more likely to survive and reproduce. This principle is closely intertwined with mating preferences, a key aspect of sexual selection, which evolutionary psychologists believe is driven by instincts to propagate one's genes. Such instincts significantly influence mating behaviors and preferences between genders.
Females, due to their biological roles in conception, pregnancy, and nursing, inherently...
Trophic Efficiency00:46

Trophic Efficiency

Trophic level transfer efficiency (TLTE) is a measure of the total energy transfer from one trophic level to the next. Due to extensive energy loss as metabolic heat, an average of only 10% of the original energy obtained is passed on to the next level. This pattern of energy loss severely limits the possible number of trophic levels in a food chain.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Global synthesis reveals systematic variation in trophic transfer efficiency across and within ecosystems.

Science advances·2026
Same author

Food web complexity underlies biodiversity effects on ecosystem functioning.

Nature·2026
Same author

Shift in Soil Fauna Feeding Mode With Litter Quality Across Forest Biomes.

Ecology letters·2026
Same author

Publisher Correction: Greater trophic diversity of soil animal communities under agricultural land use and tropical climate.

Nature ecology & evolution·2026
Same author

Greater trophic diversity of soil animal communities under agricultural land use and tropical climate.

Nature ecology & evolution·2026
Same author

Degradation of fish food webs in the Anthropocene.

Science advances·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 28, 2026

A Real-Time Interactive System for Studying Confrontational Pursuit Behavior in Rodents
06:25

A Real-Time Interactive System for Studying Confrontational Pursuit Behavior in Rodents

Published on: May 16, 2025

The allometry of prey preferences.

Gregor Kalinkat1, Björn Christian Rall, Olivera Vucic-Pestic

  • 1Department of Biology, Darmstadt University of Technology, Darmstadt, Germany. kalinkat@bio.tu-darmstadt.de

Plos One
|October 15, 2011
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Predators show active preferences for larger prey, especially when much larger themselves. This finding, based on multi-prey functional responses, advances understanding of food web stability and predator-prey dynamics.

More Related Videos

Assaying Predatory Feeding Behaviors in Pristionchus and Other Nematodes
06:27

Assaying Predatory Feeding Behaviors in Pristionchus and Other Nematodes

Published on: September 4, 2016

Experimental Manipulation of Body Size to Estimate Morphological Scaling Relationships in Drosophila
06:00

Experimental Manipulation of Body Size to Estimate Morphological Scaling Relationships in Drosophila

Published on: October 1, 2011

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 28, 2026

A Real-Time Interactive System for Studying Confrontational Pursuit Behavior in Rodents
06:25

A Real-Time Interactive System for Studying Confrontational Pursuit Behavior in Rodents

Published on: May 16, 2025

Assaying Predatory Feeding Behaviors in Pristionchus and Other Nematodes
06:27

Assaying Predatory Feeding Behaviors in Pristionchus and Other Nematodes

Published on: September 4, 2016

Experimental Manipulation of Body Size to Estimate Morphological Scaling Relationships in Drosophila
06:00

Experimental Manipulation of Body Size to Estimate Morphological Scaling Relationships in Drosophila

Published on: October 1, 2011

Area of Science:

  • Ecology
  • Zoology
  • Theoretical Ecology

Background:

  • Food web stability depends on predator-prey interactions (functional responses).
  • Previous studies focused on single-prey responses, leaving multi-prey dynamics uncertain.
  • Density-dependent consumption is an insufficient null model for complex food webs.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To test the validity of single-prey functional responses in multi-prey scenarios.
  • To develop novel null models for multi-prey functional responses using allometric scaling.
  • To investigate predator preferences (active vs. passive switching) in complex food webs.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized two-prey functional responses with parameters from allometric scaling relationships.
  • Conducted experiments with wolf spiders and ground beetles preying on small and large prey.
  • Defined passive and active preferences based on deviations from null model predictions.

Main Results:

  • Predators at least twice the size of larger prey exhibited active and passive preferences for larger prey.
  • Active preferences significantly increased with predator-prey body-mass ratio.
  • Demonstrated the influence of predator-prey size difference on feeding interactions.

Conclusions:

  • Strictly density-dependent consumption is inadequate for multi-prey systems.
  • Allometric scaling of functional response parameters is crucial for understanding complex food webs.
  • Preference allometry can help predict functional response distributions in natural ecosystems.