Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Causality in Epidemiology01:21

Causality in Epidemiology

Causality or causation is a fundamental concept in epidemiology, vital for understanding the relationships between various factors and health outcomes. Despite its importance, there's no single, universally accepted definition of causality within the discipline. Drawing from a systematic review, causality in epidemiology encompasses several definitions, including production, necessary and sufficient, sufficient-component, counterfactual, and probabilistic models. Each has its strengths and...
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II01:28

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II

The Bradford Hill criteria serve as guidelines for establishing causative links in epidemiological research. Beyond Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality, key criteria also include Biological Gradient, Plausibility, Coherence, Experiment, and Analogy. These principles assist scientists in assessing the likelihood of causation in complex biological contexts. Below is a summary of these concepts:
Pharmacodynamic Models: Direct Effect Model and Indirect Response Model01:29

Pharmacodynamic Models: Direct Effect Model and Indirect Response Model

Pharmacodynamic models are essential tools in understanding the relationship between drug concentrations and their effects on biological systems. By characterizing the dynamics of drug action, these models guide dose selection, optimize therapeutic efficacy, and inform the development of new drugs. Two major classes of pharmacodynamic models include direct effect and indirect response models.Direct Effect ModelsDirect effect models describe the immediate relationship between drug concentration...
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - I01:30

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - I

The Bradford Hill criteria are a group of principles that provide a framework to determine a causal relationship between a specific factor and a disease. There are nine criteria that are pivotal in assessing causality in epidemiological studies. Here's a closer look at Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality criteria with definitions and examples:
Correlation and Causation01:27

Correlation and Causation

Statistical tests can calculate whether there is a relationship, or correlation, between independent and dependent variables. An indirect relationship of the variables signifies a correlation, while a direct relationship shows causation. If it is determined that no connection exists between the variables, then the correlation is a coincidence.
Correlation versus Causation
If the dependent variable increases or decreases when the independent variable increases, there is a positive or negative...
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis01:23

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis

Mechanistic models are utilized in individual analysis using single-source data, but imperfections arise due to data collection errors, preventing perfect prediction of observed data. The mathematical equation involves known values (Xi), observed concentrations (Ci), measurement errors (εi), model parameters (ϕj), and the related function (ƒi) for i number of values. Different least-squares metrics quantify differences between predicted and observed values. The ordinary least squares (OLS)...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Top-down and bottom-up evaluation of thermochemistry of α,ω-alkanediols.

Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP·2026
Same author

Spectroscopic, electrochemical, thermodynamic and theoretical insights into solvent effects for the intensification of the modified OxFA process.

RSC advances·2026
Same author

Determination and Validation of Standard Enthalpies of Formation and Sublimation of Potassium Salts Using Solution Calorimetry and Quantum-Chemical Calculations.

ChemistryOpen·2026
Same author

Characterizing the performance of an antibiotic resistance prediction tool, gnomonicus, using a diverse test set of 2,663 <i>Mycobacterium tuberculosis</i> samples.

Microbial genomics·2025
Same author

Evaluating 12 automated, whole-genome sequencing analysis pipelines for Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex: a comparative study.

The Lancet. Microbe·2025
Same author

Rudolf Nieuwenhuys (11 June 1927-4 November 2024): a scholarly life.

Brain structure & function·2025
Same journal

Category-selective neural decreases in the human ventral occipito-temporal cortex as defined with intracranial recordings.

NeuroImage·2026
Same journal

EEG-Based Brain Fingerprints Elicited by Focal Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of the Primary Motor Cortex.

NeuroImage·2026
Same journal

The Association between Brain Oscillatory Activity and Immediate Memory under Different Magnetoencephalography Paradigms: A population-based Study.

NeuroImage·2026
Same journal

Brain response to awe experiences in virtual reality: an integrated linear and nonlinear EEG analysis.

NeuroImage·2026
Same journal

Convergent imaging and genetic signatures of gray matter atrophy in Parkinson's disease.

NeuroImage·2026
Same journal

What actually matters in multi-compartment EEG head models: A controlled FEM study of parcellation granularity, skull layering, mesh quality, noise, and inverse solver.

NeuroImage·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Videos

Critical comments on dynamic causal modelling.

Gabriele Lohmann1, Kerstin Erfurth, Karsten Müller

  • 1Max-Planck-Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany. lohmann@cbs.mpg.de

Neuroimage
|October 18, 2011
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Dynamic Causal Modelling (DCM) faces challenges in brain connectivity research. This study critically evaluates DCM

Related Experiment Videos

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Computational Neuroscience
  • Brain Imaging Analysis

Background:

  • Dynamic Causal Modelling (DCM) is a method to infer directed influences between brain regions using neuroimaging data (EEG/MEG, fMRI).
  • It relies on fitting multiple models to time-series data and selecting the best model via Bayesian model comparison.
  • Previous applications have advanced the understanding of effective connectivity in the brain.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critically evaluate the Dynamic Causal Modelling (DCM) technique.
  • To identify and discuss key limitations and challenges associated with DCM.
  • To assess the robustness and validity of DCM's model selection and validation procedures.

Main Methods:

  • Review and critical analysis of the theoretical underpinnings of Dynamic Causal Modelling.
  • Examination of the computational aspects, specifically addressing combinatorial explosion in model space.
  • Evaluation of the Bayesian model selection framework and its susceptibility to errors.
  • Discussion of challenges related to the validation of selected DCM models.

Main Results:

  • Dynamic Causal Modelling (DCM) is susceptible to combinatorial explosion, leading to an unmanageable number of potential models.
  • The Bayesian model selection procedure within DCM may not be sufficiently robust, potentially leading to incorrect model choices.
  • Significant challenges exist in validating the selected DCM models, raising concerns about the reliability of inferred brain connectivity.

Conclusions:

  • Dynamic Causal Modelling (DCM) presents significant challenges that question its current application in brain connectivity research.
  • The identified issues in model space complexity, selection validity, and model validation necessitate cautious interpretation of DCM results.
  • Further methodological development is required to address these limitations and enhance the reliability of DCM for investigating brain dynamics.