Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Beyond efficacy testing: introducing preventive cardiology into primary care.

T E Kottke1, L I Solberg, M L Brekke

  • 1Cardiovascular Division, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905.

American Journal of Preventive Medicine
|January 1, 1990
PubMed
Summary

Implementing effective cardiovascular disease interventions faces delays due to conflicts between research protocols and patient care needs. A supportive structure is also crucial for integrating preventive cardiology into routine practice.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Continued smoking following successful percutaneous coronary revascularization increased the risk of all-cause mortality and Q-wave MI.

Evidence-based cardiovascular medicine·2005
Same author

Sudden cardiac death in diabetes mellitus: risk factors in the Rochester diabetic neuropathy study.

Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry·2005
Same author

Preventing heart disease and stroke: messages from the United States.

The Keio journal of medicine·2002
Same author

The failure of a controlled trial to improve depression care: a qualitative study.

The Joint Commission journal on quality improvement·2002
Same author

A CQI intervention to change the care of depression: a controlled study.

Effective clinical practice : ECP·2002
Same author

Aids to quitting tobacco use: how important are they outside controlled trials?

Preventive medicine·2001

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Preventive Medicine
  • Clinical Practice Research

Background:

  • Documented cardiovascular disease risk factor interventions are not fully integrated into clinical practice.
  • A conflict exists between ideal efficacy testing and ideal patient care protocols.
  • Efficacy testing prioritizes community knowledge over individual benefit, while patient care prioritizes individual benefit.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify reasons for the slow adoption of evidence-based cardiovascular interventions.
  • To explore the conflict between research efficacy testing and clinical patient care.
  • To highlight the need for a supporting structure for preventive cardiology.

Main Methods:

  • Conceptual analysis of research efficacy testing versus clinical patient care attributes.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Identification of barriers to the integration of preventive cardiology.
  • Discussion of the ideal attributes for both efficacy testing and patient care.

    • Main Results:

    • The ideal efficacy-testing protocol is minimally responsive to individual needs, whereas ideal patient care is maximally responsive.
    • Lack of a supporting structure hinders the incorporation of preventive cardiology.
    • Reconciling research and clinical goals is essential for progress.

    Conclusions:

    • Understanding the conflict between efficacy testing and patient care is key to improving intervention adoption.
    • Developing a supportive infrastructure is necessary for integrating preventive cardiology.
    • Aligning patient care systems with efficacy-testing protocols can enhance both research and clinical outcomes.