Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 28, 2026

Predicting Amputation using Local Circulating Mononuclear Progenitor Cells in Angioplasty-treated Patients with Critical Limb Ischemia
Published on: September 22, 2020
Ambulatory blood pressure variability is associated with restenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention in
Serkan Cay1, Goksel Cagirci, Ahmet Duran Demir
1Department of Cardiology, Gulhane Military Medical Academy Haydarpasa Education Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey. cayserkan@yahoo.com
Insights
Blood pressure variability is linked to restenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Higher BP variability indices predict restenosis, offering sensitive and specific diagnostic markers.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Vascular Medicine
- Clinical Trials
Background:
- Blood pressure (BP) variability is a known risk factor for cardiovascular events.
- Limited data exist on the association between BP variability and binary restenosis following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the relationship between BP variability and binary restenosis after PCI.
- To determine if BP variability indices can predict restenosis post-PCI.
Main Methods:
- A multicenter study involving 100 stable coronary artery disease patients undergoing PCI.
- 24-hour ambulatory BP monitoring was performed before PCI to calculate BP variability indices (SD, VC).
- Patients were assessed for binary restenosis via coronary angiography at 6 months, forming restenosis (n=30) and control (n=70) groups.
Main Results:
- Significantly higher systolic and diastolic BP variability indices (24-h, day, night) were observed in the restenosis group compared to the control group.
- All BP variability indices, except diastolic VC at night, were independent predictors of restenosis in multivariate analysis.
- Cut-off values for 24-h systolic SD (11.4mmHg) and VC (13%) demonstrated high sensitivity (93%) and specificity (94% and 91%) for predicting binary restenosis.
Conclusions:
- Blood pressure variability indices are significantly associated with binary restenosis after PCI.
- Elevated BP variability independently predicts restenosis, serving as a sensitive and specific marker for risk stratification.
Background:
Previous studies have showed that BP variability is associated with cardiovascular events. However, no data were available regarding binary restenosis as an end-point after percutenous coronary intervention (PCI).
Methods And Results:
This multicenter study included 100 consecutive normotensive patients with stable coronary artery disease who were planned for PCI. Before the index procedure, office BP and 24-h ambulatory BP measurements were performed. BP variability indices including systolic and diastolic 24-h average, the day and the night values of standard deviation (SD) and variation coefficient (VC) were measured and calculated. All patients underwent repeat coronary angiography at 6-month. According to angiographic results, 2 groups were formed; a restenosis group (n=30) with binary restenosis of the stented segment and a control group (n=70) with a stenosis diameter of <50% in stented segment. Systolic SD and VC values for 24-h average (14.0±2.8mmHg vs. 9.5±1.6mmHg, p<0.001 and 16%±3 vs. 11%±2, p<0.001, respectively), the day (15.2±3.9mmHg vs. 10.6±1.7mmHg, p<0.001 and 17%±4 vs. 12%±2, p<0.001, respectively), and the night (12.8±4.1mmHg vs. 8.4±2.4mmHg, p<0.001 and 14%±5 vs. 11%±3, p=0.004, respectively) values were significantly higher in restenosis group compared to control group. Similarly, diastolic SD and VC values for 24-h average (10.6±2.5mmHg vs. 8.1±1.5mmHg, p<0.001 and 12%±3 vs. 9%±2, p=0.001, respectively), the day (11.1±2.9mmHg vs. 9.0±1.8mmHg, p=0.003 and 12%±3 vs. 10%±2, p=0.006, respectively), and the night (10.0±3.6mmHg vs. 7.2±2.0mmHg, p=0.001 and 11%±5 vs. 9%±3, p=0.059, respectively) values were significantly higher in restenosis group compared to no restenosis group except for diastolic VC night. All systolic and diastolic BP variability indices except diastolic VC night were found to be independent predictors of risk of restenosis in multivariate analysis. In addition, the cut-off values of 11.4mmHg and 13% for 24-h systolic SD and VC, respectively, were found to be highly sensitive (93% for both) and specific (94% and 91%, respectively) for predicting binary restenosis at 6-month after PCI.
Conclusions:
BP variability indices are significantly and independently associated with binary restenosis and higher values can predict restenosis after PCI sensitively and specifically.
Related Concept Videos
Peripheral Arterial Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Evaluation
Measurement of Blood Pressure
Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Assessing Blood Pressure
Special considerations while measuring blood pressure
Monitoring Both Arms:
Monitoring BP in both arms during the initial assessment is advisable, as the systolic value may differ by five to ten mm Hg between arms. For subsequent BP assessments, use the arm with the higher reading.
Sites for measuring blood pressure
The Brachial Artery: Primary Site for Blood Pressure Measurement
Assessment of blood pressure in brachial artery(two-step method)