Trauma activation: are we making the right call? A 3-year experience at a Level I pediatric trauma center

Derek Williams1, Robert Foglia, Steve Megison

  • 1Pediatric Trauma Service, Division of Pediatric Surgery, Children's Medical Center Dallas, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX 75235, USA.

Insights

Pediatric trauma activation systems help manage severe injuries, but criteria need refinement. Trauma activation (TA) patients showed higher ICU admission and mortality rates, with significant differences between STAT and ALERT activations.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Trauma Care
  • Emergency Medicine Systems
  • Healthcare Management

Background:

  • Trauma is the leading cause of death in children.
  • Pediatric trauma centers manage a significant number of hospital admissions.
  • A Level I pediatric trauma center reviewed its 2-level trauma activation (TA) system.

Purpose of the Study:

  • Assess injury severity in trauma patients.
  • Evaluate resource utilization within the TA system.
  • Analyze patient outcomes.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective analysis of trauma patients (2006-2008).
  • Data included trauma activation level (STAT vs. ALERT), injury mechanism, ICU admission, Injury Severity Score (ISS), operative intervention, and survival.
  • Compared outcomes between TA and non-TA patients.

Main Results:

  • 4502 patients analyzed; 29.2% received trauma activation.
  • TA patients had higher ICU admission rates (38.2% vs. 16.3%) and ISS.
  • Mortality was significantly higher in TA patients (5.8%) compared to non-TA patients (0.28%).

Conclusions:

  • The trauma activation system is integral to Level I pediatric trauma centers.
  • TA patients exhibit higher acuity, ICU needs, and mortality.
  • Opportunities exist to optimize TA criteria due to overutilization and ISS discordance.
Abstract