Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Ethics in Research01:56

Ethics in Research

Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
Data Collection I01:30

Data Collection I

Data collection gathers information needed to make accurate judgments about a patient's present condition. During a health history interview, subjective data is collected from the patient, their caregivers, or family members, and objective data is collected through observations and physical assessment. Patients are the primary source of subjective data. Thus information gathered from patients through interviews, observations, and physical examination is primary data. Secondary sources of data...
Shearing Stress01:18

Shearing Stress

Shearing stress, denoted by the Greek letter tau (τ), is stress caused by forces acting transversely on an object. These forces create internal ones within the entity in the plane where the external forces are applied. The resultant of these internal forces is the shear in the section.
The average shearing stress can be calculated by dividing the shear by the area of the cross-section.
Ethics and Bioethics01:22

Ethics and Bioethics

Ethics is a philosophical study of moral actions. Ethics attempts to determine what is valuable for individuals and society. It examines the rational justification of moral judgments and analyzes what is morally just, fair, and right. Bioethics is a sub-discipline of applied ethics that analyzes the philosophical, social, and legal issues in life sciences and medicine. Ethical theories serve as a foundation for decision-making and represent the viewpoints from which people seek direction. They...
Data Collection by Survey01:07

Data Collection by Survey

The systematic method of obtaining and analyzing accurate information of a population is called data collection. A survey is a standard method of data collection that involves collecting information from a target human population about their experience, opinion, or knowledge of a product, service, or process. The responses are recorded and interpreted. The most common survey examples are written questionnaires, face-to-face or telephonic conversations, focus groups, and electronic (e-mail or...
Journal Bearings01:23

Journal Bearings

Journal bearings are mechanical components that support and provide lateral stability to rotating shafts and axles. They are crucial in reducing friction, wear, and vibration in machinery such as engines, turbines, and pumps. The principle behind journal bearings is forming a thin lubricant film between the bearing surface and the rotating shaft, which minimizes direct contact and reduces frictional forces.
To better understand the concept of journal bearings, consider a rope winch with dry or...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Resilience and corpus callosum microstructure in adolescence.

Psychological medicine·2015
Same author

Genomic architecture of human neuroanatomical diversity.

Molecular psychiatry·2014
Same author

Interoperable atlases of the human brain.

NeuroImage·2014
Same author

Single nucleotide polymorphism in the neuroplastin locus associates with cortical thickness and intellectual ability in adolescents.

Molecular psychiatry·2014
Same author

Incorrect ICBM-DTI-81 atlas orientation and white matter labels.

Frontiers in neuroscience·2013
Same author

Boys do it the right way: sex-dependent amygdala lateralization during face processing in adolescents.

NeuroImage·2011
Same journal

Brain-Inspired Large Model Mindreading.

NeuroImage·2026
Same journal

Light on Broken Networks: Resting-State fNIRS as a Tool for Connectivity Mapping.

NeuroImage·2026
Same journal

Criticism-Evoked Rumination Is Linked to Dynamic adjustments of the Left Superficial Amygdala in Adolescents.

NeuroImage·2026
Same journal

GeNED.ar cohort: Neuroimaging Resource for Aging Studies in an Admixed Population from Argentina.

NeuroImage·2026
Same journal

DTI-ALPS index correlates with poor neuromodulation outcomes of bilateral STN-DBS in Parkinson's disease patients: a prospective cohort study.

NeuroImage·2026
Same journal

Decoding neuronal criticality firing patterns for large brain based EEG models.

NeuroImage·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 28, 2026

A Metadata Extraction Approach for Clinical Case Reports to Enable Advanced Understanding of Biomedical Concepts
07:50

A Metadata Extraction Approach for Clinical Case Reports to Enable Advanced Understanding of Biomedical Concepts

Published on: September 20, 2018

Why shared data should not be acknowledged on the author byline.

T Rohlfing1, J-B Poline

  • 1SRI International, 333 Ravenswood Ave, Menlo Park, CA 94025, USA. rohlfing@ieee.org

Neuroimage
|October 20, 2011
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Adding data contributors to author lists undermines academic authorship standards. Alternative methods for crediting data sharing are recommended to maintain fair scientific evaluation.

More Related Videos

BioMEMS: Forging New Collaborations Between Biologists and Engineers
07:26

BioMEMS: Forging New Collaborations Between Biologists and Engineers

Published on: November 1, 2007

Reproducibility and Harmonization in Research Using Biological Standards: The Example of Platelet Agonist Collagen-Related Peptide
04:50

Reproducibility and Harmonization in Research Using Biological Standards: The Example of Platelet Agonist Collagen-Related Peptide

Published on: August 4, 2023

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 28, 2026

A Metadata Extraction Approach for Clinical Case Reports to Enable Advanced Understanding of Biomedical Concepts
07:50

A Metadata Extraction Approach for Clinical Case Reports to Enable Advanced Understanding of Biomedical Concepts

Published on: September 20, 2018

BioMEMS: Forging New Collaborations Between Biologists and Engineers
07:26

BioMEMS: Forging New Collaborations Between Biologists and Engineers

Published on: November 1, 2007

Reproducibility and Harmonization in Research Using Biological Standards: The Example of Platelet Agonist Collagen-Related Peptide
04:50

Reproducibility and Harmonization in Research Using Biological Standards: The Example of Platelet Agonist Collagen-Related Peptide

Published on: August 4, 2023

Area of Science:

  • Scientific Publishing
  • Academic Authorship Standards
  • Data Sharing Practices

Background:

  • Emerging practices involve including data contributors in author bylines.
  • This trend deviates from established academic authorship norms.
  • Concerns exist regarding the equitable recognition of contributions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze the compatibility of data contributor bylines with current authorship standards.
  • To evaluate the implications of including non-author contributors on published papers.
  • To propose alternative methods for acknowledging data sharing contributions.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of current academic authorship guidelines.
  • Examination of the ethical and practical issues arising from byline acknowledgments for data.
  • Review of alternative credit mechanisms for data contributors.

Main Results:

  • The practice of including data contributors in author bylines is incompatible with established authorship standards.
  • This practice devalues authorship and raises concerns about guest authorship and equitable credit.
  • Deviation from standards can compromise fair scientific evaluations.

Conclusions:

  • Non-author contributors, including groups or individuals sharing data, should not be listed as authors.
  • Viable alternatives for crediting data contributors include dataset publications, acknowledgments, or appendix entries.
  • Maintaining robust authorship standards is crucial for the integrity of scientific evaluation.