Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

Written case simulations: do they predict physicians' behavior?

T V Jones¹, M S Gerrity, J Earp

¹Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill 27599.

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

|January 1, 1990

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Alcohol and injuries in elderly people.

Addiction biology·2016

Same author

A practice-based approach for converting from proton pump inhibitors to less costly therapy.

Effective clinical practice : ECP·2002

Same author

Effectiveness of an intervention to improve primary care provider recognition of depression.

Effective clinical practice : ECP·2001

Same author

Identifying physicians likely to benefit from depression education: a challenge for health care organizations.

Medical care·2001

Same author

Interventions to improve physicians' well-being and patient care: a commentary.

Social science & medicine (1982)·2001

Same author

Patients' knowledge of options at the end of life: ignorance in the face of death.

JAMA·2000

Same journal

AI-enabled GRADE: How the GRADE Working Group will use automation to rate the certainty of evidence of intervention effects.

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2026

Same journal

Harms Reporting Was Frequently Incomplete or Discordant in Biomedical Randomized Trials Published in 2023: A Meta-epidemiological Study.

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2026

Same journal

Using an Open Science Checklist in Grant Proposal Reviews to Predict Reproducibility of Funded Publications.

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2026

Same journal

A comparison of five statistical methods used to analyse longitudinal EORTC QLQ-C30 quality of life scores in randomised controlled trials: a simulation study.

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2026

Same journal

Sample Size Determination for Decision-centered Pragmatic Trials.

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2026

Same journal

Many multicenter randomized controlled trials do not account for center effect: a methodological review.

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2026

See all related articles

Written case simulations are frequently used to assess physician decision-making. However, few studies validate if these simulations accurately predict real clinical behavior, raising concerns about their reliability.

Area of Science:

Medical Education
Healthcare Simulation
Physician Competency Assessment

Background:

Written case simulations are widely employed to evaluate physician decision-making and clinical competence.
The validity of these simulations as proxies for actual clinical behavior is often assumed but rarely examined.
Criterion validity, the extent to which simulation performance correlates with real-world performance, is crucial for accurate assessment.

Purpose of the Study:

To systematically review the literature on the criterion validity of written case simulations.
To assess the methodological rigor of studies investigating the predictive ability of written simulations for actual clinical behavior.
To determine the extent to which current research supports the assumption that written simulations reflect real clinical encounters.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Methods:

A systematic search of published articles utilizing written case simulations was conducted.
Methodological criteria were applied to evaluate the assessment of criterion validity in selected studies.
The quality of study design and execution for criterion validity interpretation was critically appraised.

Main Results:

Out of 74 articles reviewed, only 11 (15%) included an assessment of criterion validity.
Of these 11 studies, only 2 were sufficiently well-designed for a full interpretation of criterion validity.
The reviewed studies did not yield a clear consensus on the effectiveness of written simulations as proxy measures for actual physician behavior.

Conclusions:

There is a significant lack of empirical evidence supporting the criterion validity of written case simulations.
Current research is insufficient to confidently assume that physician responses in simulations accurately predict real-world clinical actions.
Further methodologically sound research is required to establish the predictive validity of written case simulations in medical education and practice.