Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 28, 2026

05:16
Cutoff Value of Phase Angle by Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis at Admission as a Prognostic Factor in Patients with Acute Heart Failure
Published on: June 10, 2025
Risk prediction models for hospital readmission: a systematic review
Devan Kansagara1, Honora Englander, Amanda Salanitro
1Department of General Internal Medicine, Portland Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Mailcode RD71, 3710 SW US Veterans Hospital Rd, Portland, OR 97239, USA. kansagar@ohsu.edu
JAMA
|October 20, 2011
Summary
Most hospital readmission risk prediction models perform poorly, hindering effective patient care interventions and hospital comparisons. Further research is needed to improve these models for clinical and administrative use.
Area of Science:
- Health Services Research
- Medical Informatics
- Clinical Epidemiology
Background:
- Predicting hospital readmission risk is crucial for targeted care transition interventions.
- Accurate risk adjustment is essential for fair hospital performance comparisons.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically review validated readmission risk prediction models.
- To evaluate model performance and assess their suitability for clinical and administrative applications.
Main Methods:
- Searched MEDLINE, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE databases.
- Included studies published in English with derivation and validation cohorts for medical patients.
- Extracted data on patient populations, settings, model performance (discrimination, calibration), and data collection methods.
Main Results:
- 30 studies of 26 unique models were identified, primarily focusing on 30-day readmissions.
- Models for hospital comparison (n=14) showed poor discrimination (c-statistic 0.55-0.65).
- Models for identifying high-risk patients at discharge (n=5) demonstrated better discrimination (c-statistic 0.68-0.83).
- Functional and social variables improved model discrimination, but were underutilized.
Conclusions:
- Current readmission risk prediction models generally exhibit poor performance for both comparative and clinical purposes.
- While some models may offer utility in specific contexts, significant improvements are necessary for widespread adoption.
- Future model development should incorporate a broader range of variables, including social determinants of health.
