Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks01:21

Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks

Friedman's Two-Way Analysis of Variance by Ranks is a nonparametric test designed to identify differences across multiple test attempts when traditional assumptions of normality and equal variances do not apply. Unlike conventional ANOVA, which requires normally distributed data with equal variances, Friedman's test is ideal for ordinal or non-normally distributed data, making it particularly useful for analyzing dependent samples, such as matched subjects over time or repeated measures from...
Decision Making: P-value Method01:09

Decision Making: P-value Method

The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim  is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses:  a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can have a...
Econometric Views (EViews)01:29

Econometric Views (EViews)

Econometric Views, often stylized as EViews, is a package that merges statistical analysis with econometric studies. It is designed to provide tools for time series analysis, forecasting, and econometric model simulation. The software originated from MicroTSP software and has evolved significantly since its inception in 1981. The history of EViews is marked by a continuous effort to enhance its computational speed and user interface. It was initially developed for large computing systems but...
One-Compartment Open Model: Wagner-Nelson and Loo Riegelman Method for ka Estimation01:24

One-Compartment Open Model: Wagner-Nelson and Loo Riegelman Method for ka Estimation

This lesson introduces two critical methods in pharmacokinetics, the Wagner-Nelson and Loo-Riegelman methods, used for estimating the absorption rate constant (ka) for drugs administered via non-intravenous routes. The Wagner-Nelson method relates ka to the plasma concentration derived from the slope of a semilog percent unabsorbed time plot. However, it is limited to drugs with one-compartment kinetics and can be impacted by factors like gastrointestinal motility or enzymatic degradation.
On...
What are Estimates?01:06

What are Estimates?

It isn't easy to measure a parameter such as the mean height or the mean weight of a population. So, we draw samples from the population and calculate the mean height or mean weight of the individuals in the sample. This sample data acts as a representative measure of the population parameter. These sample statistics are known as estimates. 
The estimate for the mean of a sample is denoted by ͞x, whereas the mean of the population is designated as μ. Further, parameters such as the mean,...
Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Biomonitoring of nutritional and toxic elements in raw and cooked rice in the Health Effects of Arsenic Longitudinal Study, Bangladesh.

Ecotoxicology and environmental safety·2026
Same author

Influenza Antiviral Prescriptions in the US Inpatient and Outpatient Settings During the 2015-2022 Influenza Seasons.

Influenza and other respiratory viruses·2026
Same author

PERsonalised Medicine for Intensification of Treatment (PERMIT) in type 2 diabetes mellitus: a target trial emulation from routine data.

Health technology assessment (Winchester, England)·2026
Same author

Interplay Between the Gut-Microbiota-Brain Axis and the Immune System in Viral Neuroinvasion and CNS Pathogenesis.

Comprehensive Physiology·2026
Same author

From sensing to shaping: microglial responses in the pathogenesis of viral encephalitis.

Current opinion in immunology·2026
Same author

Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: A Review.

JAMA·2026
Same journal

Design of Trials with Composite Endpoints with the R Package CompAREdesign.

Statistics in biosciences·2026
Same journal

Pan-Cancer Drug Response Prediction Using Integrative Principal Component Regression.

Statistics in biosciences·2026
Same journal

Variance Estimation for Weighted Average Treatment Effects.

Statistics in biosciences·2026
Same journal

Bayesian Modeling on Microbiome Data Analysis: Application to Subgingival Microbiome Study.

Statistics in biosciences·2026
Same journal

Canopy2: Tumor Phylogeny Inference by Bulk DNA and Single-Cell RNA Sequencing.

Statistics in biosciences·2026
Same journal

Multilevel Multivariate Functional Principal Component Analysis of Evoked and Induced Event-Related Spectral Perturbations.

Statistics in biosciences·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 28, 2026

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

Estimating Decision-Relevant Comparative Effects Using Instrumental Variables.

Anirban Basu1

  • 1Departments of Health Services and Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle, 1959 NE Pacific St, Box 357660, Seattle, WA 98195-7660, USA.

Statistics in Biosciences
|October 20, 2011
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Instrumental variables (IV) methods can mask treatment effect heterogeneity. New approaches using IVs better address self-selection and varied patient outcomes in health economics research.

More Related Videos

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 28, 2026

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

Area of Science:

  • Health Economics
  • Biostatistics
  • Medical Research

Background:

  • Instrumental variables (IV) methods are common in health economics for adjusting observational studies.
  • Limited focus exists on IV application with heterogeneous treatment effects and self-selection bias.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore challenges of IV estimators with effect heterogeneity and self-selection.
  • To compare conventional IV analysis with alternative IV approaches.
  • To examine the impact of treatment choices on survival rates for breast cancer patients.

Main Methods:

  • Overview of IV challenges in the presence of effect heterogeneity and self-selection.
  • Comparison of conventional IV analysis with alternative IV strategies.
  • Empirical analysis using Medicare data on breast cancer patients.

Main Results:

  • Traditional IV results may obscure significant heterogeneity in treatment effects.
  • Alternative IV methods offer improved insights into varied patient outcomes.
  • Breast-conserving surgery versus mastectomy impacts 3-year survival rates differently.

Conclusions:

  • Conventional IV methods may mask crucial heterogeneity in treatment effects.
  • Alternative IV approaches are vital for accurate comparative effectiveness research.
  • Understanding heterogeneity is key for technology diffusion and patient care decisions.