Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 28, 2026

Echocardiographic Evaluation of Atrial Communications before Transcatheter Closure
Published on: February 8, 2022
Comparison between transthoracic echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in patients status post
Jason G Ho1, Mervyn D Cohen, Eric S Ebenroth
1Section of Pediatric Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics, Riley Hospital for Children, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Ind 46202, USA.
Insights
Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging offers superior image quality and baffle visualization compared to echocardiography in patients after atrial switch surgery, despite minimal cost differences. MRI is recommended for serial evaluations in this population.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular imaging
- Congenital heart disease
- Medical technology assessment
Background:
- Patients with transposition of the great arteries status post atrial switch require serial imaging evaluations.
- Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) is a common first-line imaging modality but has limitations.
- Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) offers potential advantages over TTE for evaluating this patient group.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare image quality, cost, right ventricular ejection fraction (RVEF) analysis, and baffle visualization between TTE and CMR.
- To evaluate the utility of CMR as a primary imaging modality for patients status post atrial switch for transposition of the great arteries.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective review of 12 patients who underwent both TTE and CMR within a mean of 157 days.
- Independent analysis of image quality, RVEF, and baffle visualization by three physicians.
- Comparison of institutional and Medicaid charges for both imaging modalities.
Main Results:
- CMR demonstrated significantly higher image quality (P = .002) and better visualization of inferior vena cava baffles (33% vs. 97%, P = .002) compared to TTE.
- TTE underestimated RVEF (36.1%) compared to CMR (47.8%, P = .002).
- TTE was 18% and 38% less costly than CMR based on hospital charges and Medicaid reimbursement, respectively.
Conclusions:
- CMR provides superior image quality and RVEF assessment compared to TTE in patients status post atrial switch.
- CMR offers improved visualization of critical baffle structures.
- CMR should be considered a first-line imaging modality for serial evaluation in this specific patient population, balancing diagnostic accuracy with cost-effectiveness.
Objectives:
This study compares image quality, cost, right ventricular ejection fraction analysis, and baffle visualization between transthoracic echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in those status post atrial switch for transposition of the great arteries.
Background:
This population requires imaging for serial evaluations. Transthoracic echocardiography is often first line but has drawbacks, many of which are addressed by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.
Methods:
Twelve patients (mean age 25 years) with relatively concurrent (mean 157 days) studies were included. Three separate echocardiography and magnetic resonance imaging physicians independently analyzed baffles, image quality, and right ventricular ejection fractions. Institutional and Medicaid charges were compared.
Results:
For right ventricular ejection fraction, echocardiography (36.1%) underestimated cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (47.8%, P = .002). Image quality for transthoracic echocardiography was significantly rated lower than cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (P = .002). Baffles were better seen in cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (transthoracic echocardiography vs. cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: superior vena cava 86% vs. 100% [P = .063]; inferior vena cava 33% vs. 97% [P = .002]; pulmonary vein 92% vs. 100% [P = .250]). Comparing hospital charges and Medicaid reimbursement, transthoracic echocardiography respectively costs 18% and 38% less than cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.
Conclusions:
In conclusion, transthoracic echocardiography underestimated right ventricular ejection fraction compared to cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging had consistently higher image quality and better visualization of the baffles. Cost differences are minimal. We propose that cardiac magnetic resonance imaging be considered first line for imaging in certain patients' status post atrial switch procedure.
More Related Videos
06:29Cardiac Magnetic Resonance for the Evaluation of Suspected Cardiac Thrombus: Conventional and Emerging Techniques
Published on: June 11, 2019
08:10Estimating Bilateral Atrial Function by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Feature Tracking in Patients with Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: July 20, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System I:Echocardiography
Indications: Echocardiography is utilized to diagnose heart failure, valve disorders, and myocardial infarction. It also assesses cardiac structures' size, shape, and motion, evaluates...
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System II:Types of Echocardiography
Types of Echocardiography
Transthoracic Echocardiography (TTE)
TTE is the most common type of echocardiogram which involves placing a transducer on the patient's chest, emitting sound waves to create heart images. TTE is invaluable for evaluating the heart's size, structure, and motion, making it particularly useful for diagnosing...
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System IV: CMRI
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System V: CT
Mitral Stenosis II: Clinical features and Diagnostic Tests
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies