Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 28, 2026

An Orthotopic Endometrial Cancer Model with Retroperitoneal Lymphadenopathy Made From In Vivo Propagated and Cultured VX2 Cells
Published on: September 12, 2019
Pelvic exenteration with curative intent for recurrent uterine malignancies
Fady Khoury-Collado1, M Heather Einstein, Bernard H Bochner
1Department of Surgery, Gynecology Service, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA.
Objective:
To evaluate the outcomes observed with pelvic exenteration with curative intent for recurrent uterine malignancies in the modern era.
Methods:
We reviewed the records of all patients who underwent this procedure at our institution between 1/1997 and 03/2011. Postoperative complications up to 90 days after surgery were analyzed and graded as per our institution grading system. Survivals were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.
Results:
During the study period, 21 patients were identified. Median age at the time of exenteration was 57 years (range, 36-75). Median tumor size was 6 cm (range, microscopic - 14.5). Tumor histology was: endometrioid, 10 cases; mixed, serous, and carcinosarcoma, 7 cases; and sarcomas, 4 cases. The type of exenteration was: total, 14 cases; anterior, 6 cases and posterior, 1 case. There were no intra- or postoperative mortalities. Seven patients (33%) developed at least one grade 2 complication, and 10 patients (48%) developed at least one grade 3 complication. Five (24%) patients had to be re-operated on in the first 90 days post surgery. The median follow up time after exenteration was 39 months (range, 5-112). The 5-year survival of the entire cohort was 40% (95% CI: 18-63). An improved survival was observed in patients with endometrioid tumors and sarcomas (5-year survival rates of 50% and 66%, respectively). The presence of pelvic sidewall involvement and/or hydronephrosis did not negatively affect survival.
Conclusion:
Pelvic exenteration for recurrent uterine malignancies can be associated with long-term survival in properly selected patients. A high rate of postoperative complications remains a hallmark of this procedure and should be discussed carefully with patients facing this decision.
