Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Reliability and Validity

Reliability and Validity

Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.

Data Validation

Data Validation

Data validation is an essential part of a comprehensive assessment. Validation is confirming or verifying and opening the door to gathering more assessment data as it clarifies vague or unclear data. The process of checking and verifying the collected information is called data validation. The primary purpose of data validation is to ensure data is as free from error, bias, and misinterpretation as possible.
Nursing assessment guides are generally based on holistic models rather than medical...

Response Surface Methodology

Response Surface Methodology

Response Surface Methodology (RSM) is a collection of statistical and mathematical techniques used to develop, improve, and optimize processes. It is particularly valuable when many input variables or factors potentially influence a response variable.
The process of RSM involves several key steps:

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Multi-modal adaptor-clathrin contacts drive coated vesicle assembly.

The EMBO journal·2021

Same author

Clathrin: the molecular shape shifter.

The Biochemical journal·2021

Same author

Using Crash Data to Develop Simulator Scenarios for Assessing Novice Driver Performance.

Transportation research record·2013

Same author

Licensing age issues: deliberations from a workshop devoted to this topic.

Traffic injury prevention·2013

Same author

Effects of age and experience on young driver crashes: review of recent literature.

Traffic injury prevention·2009

Same author

Graduated licensing and beyond.

American journal of preventive medicine·2008

Same journal

School zone speed compliance in the ACT, Australia: Risks, findings and recommendations for improved safety.

Journal of safety research·2026

Same journal

A bibliometric performance and network analysis of red-light camera impact on signalized intersection safety.

Journal of safety research·2026

Same journal

Effects of driver direct visibility in passenger vehicles on the risk of turning crashes with pedestrians.

Journal of safety research·2026

Same journal

The importance of employee-engaged safety audits to reduce LTI and safety-related costs.

Journal of safety research·2026

Same journal

Improving crash data quality by identifying misclassified alcohol-involved crashes using NLP on narrative data.

Journal of safety research·2026

Same journal

The influence of employee health and safety policies on the value of the organization.

Journal of safety research·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 28, 2026

Driving Simulation in the Clinic: Testing Visual Exploratory Behavior in Daily Life Activities in Patients with Visual Field Defects

Driving Simulation in the Clinic: Testing Visual Exploratory Behavior in Daily Life Activities in Patients with Visual Field Defects

Published on: September 18, 2012

On-road and simulated driving: concurrent and discriminant validation.

Daniel R Mayhew¹, Herb M Simpson, Katherine M Wood

¹Traffic Injury Research Foundation, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

Journal of Safety Research

|October 25, 2011

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

This study validates a driving simulator for measuring driving performance. Results show it accurately reflects real-world driving skills, supporting its use in research and driver education evaluation.

More Related Videos

Tactile Vibrating Toolkit and Driving Simulation Platform for Driving-Related Research

Tactile Vibrating Toolkit and Driving Simulation Platform for Driving-Related Research

Published on: December 18, 2020

Driving Under the Influence: How Music Listening Affects Driving Behaviors

Driving Under the Influence: How Music Listening Affects Driving Behaviors

Published on: March 27, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 28, 2026

Driving Simulation in the Clinic: Testing Visual Exploratory Behavior in Daily Life Activities in Patients with Visual Field Defects

Driving Simulation in the Clinic: Testing Visual Exploratory Behavior in Daily Life Activities in Patients with Visual Field Defects

Published on: September 18, 2012

Tactile Vibrating Toolkit and Driving Simulation Platform for Driving-Related Research

Tactile Vibrating Toolkit and Driving Simulation Platform for Driving-Related Research

Published on: December 18, 2020

Driving Under the Influence: How Music Listening Affects Driving Behaviors

Driving Under the Influence: How Music Listening Affects Driving Behaviors

Published on: March 27, 2019

Area of Science:

Human Factors
Transportation Safety
Psychology

Background:

Assessing driving performance is crucial for safety and training.
Driving simulators offer a controlled environment for performance evaluation.
Previous research has explored simulator validity with mixed results.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate the concurrent and discriminant validity of a driving simulator for measuring driving performance and skill.
To compare on-road driving performance with simulated driving performance in novice drivers.
To differentiate driving performance across various experience levels using the simulator.

Main Methods:

Concurrent validity study: Compared novice drivers' on-road performance with their simulator performance.
Discriminant validity study: Compared simulator performance across three groups: beginners, novices, and experienced drivers.
Statistical analysis of driving errors and performance metrics.

Main Results:

A reasonable concordance was found between on-road and simulator driving errors, supporting relative validity.
Significant differences in driving errors were observed across experience groups on the simulator, as expected.
Absolute validity was not established due to a lack of close correlation in specific error types.

Conclusions:

The driving simulator is a valid tool for measuring driving performance in research settings.
Simulator data supports the evaluation of driver education and training programs.
Further research is recommended to refine simulator validity and its application in driver assessment.