Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 28, 2026

06:20
Irradiator Commissioning and Dosimetry for Assessment of LQ α and β Parameters, Radiation Dosing Schema, and in vivo Dose Deposition
Published on: March 11, 2021
Permanent breast seed implant dosimetry quality assurance
Brian M Keller1, Ananth Ravi, Raxa Sankreacha
1Department of Medical Physics, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center, Toronto, ON, Canada. Brian.Keller@sunnybrook.ca
International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics
|October 25, 2011
Summary
Permanent breast seed implants offer accelerated partial breast irradiation for early-stage breast cancer. Dosimetric data show improved target coverage and minimal skin toxicity, supporting this novel treatment method.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Radiation Oncology
- Medical Physics
Background:
- Accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) is an alternative to whole-breast irradiation for early-stage breast cancer.
- Permanent breast seed implantation is a novel APBI technique utilizing brachytherapy.
- This study evaluates dosimetric outcomes and clinical results of permanent breast seed implantation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To present pre- and post-implant dosimetric data for permanent breast seed implants.
- To correlate dosimetric data with clinical outcomes in early-stage breast cancer patients.
- To provide recommendations for establishing permanent breast seed implant programs.
Main Methods:
- Ninety-five patients with early-stage breast cancer underwent breast-conserving surgery followed by permanent seed implantation across three clinical trials.
- Planning target volume (PTV) contouring was performed using Pinnacle workstation.
- Dosimetry calculations, including dose-volume histograms (DVHs), were conducted using a Variseed planning computer.
Main Results:
- Mean pre-implant PTV coverage (V90, V100, V150, V200) was 98.8%, 97.3%, 68.8%, and 27.8%, respectively.
- Post-implant dosimetry revealed improvements in V100 (85.6% to 88.4%, p=0.004) and V200 (36.2% to 48.3%, p<0.001) due to reduced seed motion.
- Maximum skin dose was associated with skin toxicity (p=0.014).
Conclusions:
- Preplanning dosimetry targets should include V90 ≈ 100%, V100 of 95-100%, and V200 of 20-30% for optimal outcomes.
- Target volume coverage generally improved throughout seed therapy.
- Limiting maximum skin dose to 90% of prescription dose is recommended to minimize delayed skin toxicity.

