Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 28, 2026

14:14
Standardized Technique of Aortic Valve Re-implantation for Valve-sparing Aortic Root Replacement
Published on: December 11, 2017
ADVANCE: a multisite trial of bioabsorbable steroid-eluting sinus implants
Keith D Forwith1, Rakesh K Chandra, Paul T Yun
1Advanced ENT and Allergy, Louisville, Kentucky 40207, USA. kforwith@commonwealthent.com
The Laryngoscope
|October 25, 2011
Summary
A new steroid-eluting implant improved outcomes for chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) patients after sinus surgery, reducing inflammation and adhesions with no ocular risks.
Area of Science:
- Otolaryngology
- Rhinology
- Biomaterials Science
Background:
- Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) surgery can lead to recurrence and poor healing.
- Complications include inflammation, polyposis, adhesions, and middle turbinate lateralization.
- A novel bioabsorbable, steroid-eluting implant aims to mitigate these issues.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of a steroid-eluting implant post-functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) in CRS patients.
- To assess the implant's impact on wound healing and disease recurrence.
- To determine the clinical utility of local steroid delivery via implant.
Main Methods:
- Prospective, multicenter, single-cohort trial with 50 CRS patients.
- Bilateral or unilateral steroid-eluting implant placement.
- Exclusion of oral/topical steroids for 60 days; follow-up to 6 months for patient-reported outcomes and 60 days for endoscopic assessment.
Main Results:
- Successful implant placement in all 90 sinuses.
- Minimal mean inflammation scores throughout the study.
- Low prevalence of polyposis (10.0%), adhesions (1.1%), and middle turbinate lateralization (4.4%) at 1 month.
- Statistically significant improvements in patient-reported outcomes (P < .0001).
- No clinically significant ocular pressure changes.
Conclusions:
- The bioabsorbable steroid-eluting implant is safe and effective for CRS patients undergoing FESS.
- Favorable sinus patency rates were observed.
- Minimal inflammation and adhesions suggest positive clinical impact from local steroid delivery.
- No ocular risks were identified, supporting the implant's clinical utility.
