Cochlear implantation in children with labyrinthine anomalies and cochlear nerve deficiency: implications for

Craig A Buchman1, Holly F B Teagle, Patricia A Roush

  • 1Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, USA. buchman@med.unc.edu

The Laryngoscope
|October 26, 2011
PubMed

Insights

Children with inner ear malformations and cochlear nerve deficiency (CND) receiving cochlear implants (CI) show varied outcomes. While most respond to stimulation, those with CND or severe malformations have limited speech perception and may need alternative communication strategies.

Area of Science:

  • Otolaryngology
  • Pediatric audiology
  • Neurosurgery

Background:

  • Inner ear malformations and cochlear nerve deficiency (CND) present unique challenges for hearing restoration.
  • Cochlear implantation (CI) is a common intervention, but outcomes vary based on the specific malformation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the outcomes of cochlear implantation in children with different types of inner ear malformations and/or CND.
  • To identify factors influencing speech perception and communication abilities post-CI.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective cohort study of 76 children who received cochlear implants between 1993 and 2010.
  • Assessment of imaging, surgical findings, complications, device programming, and audiological/speech performance.
  • Comparison of outcomes across groups with varying inner ear malformations and CND.

Main Results:

  • Most children responded to CI stimulation, regardless of malformation type or CND.
  • Children with CND showed higher pure tone averages and required more charge for stimulation.
  • Open-set speech perception success rates varied: 100% for incomplete partition-enlarged vestibular aqueduct (IP-EVA), 50% for hypoplastic malformations, and 19% for CND.
  • Eighth nerve compound action potential (ECAP) responses correlated with speech perception; manual communication strategies were more common in hypoplastic and CND groups.

Conclusions:

  • Children with IP-EVA malformations have a favorable prognosis for speech perception and oral communication after CI.
  • Severe malformations or CND may lead to higher stimulation needs and limited potential for open-set speech understanding and mainstream education.
  • Alternative interventions like auditory brainstem implantation or visual communication strategies should be considered for children with poorer prognoses.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos