Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 28, 2026

Microbial Communities in Nature and Laboratory - Interview
Published on: May 28, 2007
The end point is just the beginning
1Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc., San Diego, California 92121, USA. dmuchmore@halozyme.com
Abstract:
Clinical trials to support registration of new drugs are arduous, lengthy, and expensive. Diabetes treatment trials intended to seek indications for glycemic control are facilitated by the regulatory acceptance of glycosylated hemoglobin (A1C) as a validated intermediate efficacy end point. However, A1C outcomes are not meaningful when taken outside of the context of hypoglycemia risks. Current regulatory guidance indicates that A1C efficacy end points and hypoglycemia safety end points be considered separately. A composite end point for diabetes treatment trials that integrates A1C and hypoglycemia risk into a single measure is proposed. An example would be "percentage of patients achieving A1C <7% without unacceptable hypoglycemia." The benefits and limitations of such an approach are discussed.
Insights
Developing new diabetes drugs is costly. A proposed composite endpoint combines glycosylated hemoglobin (A1C) and hypoglycemia risk for more meaningful clinical trial results.
Area of Science:
- Endocrinology
- Clinical Pharmacology
- Biostatistics
Background:
- Drug registration trials are resource-intensive.
- Glycosylated hemoglobin (A1C) is an accepted surrogate endpoint for glycemic control in diabetes trials.
- Current guidelines assess A1C efficacy and hypoglycemia safety separately, limiting interpretability.
Purpose of the Study:
- To propose a composite endpoint for diabetes clinical trials.
- To integrate glycemic control (A1C) and hypoglycemia risk into a single measure.
- To discuss the advantages and disadvantages of this novel approach.
Main Methods:
- Literature review of current regulatory guidance for diabetes trials.
- Conceptualization of a composite endpoint integrating A1C and hypoglycemia.
- Discussion of the potential benefits and limitations of the proposed endpoint.
Main Results:
- A composite endpoint, such as "percentage of patients achieving A1C <7% without unacceptable hypoglycemia," is proposed.
- This approach offers a more holistic view of treatment efficacy and safety.
- Separate assessment of A1C and hypoglycemia may not fully reflect clinical utility.
Conclusions:
- A composite endpoint can provide a more comprehensive evaluation of diabetes treatments.
- Integrating efficacy and safety endpoints may improve the efficiency and relevance of clinical trials.
- Further validation and discussion are needed to implement such composite endpoints in regulatory practice.
Related Concept Videos
End Point Prediction: Gran Plot
For potentiometric titration, the Gran plot is created by plotting the...
Glycolysis: Pay-off Phase
Step 1 - 5: Glycolysis Preparatory Phase
The first phase of glycolysis has 5 steps where the glucose is...
The Endoplasmic Reticulum
The Endoplasmic Reticulum
What is the Endocrine System?
The Early Endosome: Endocytosis of Transferrin

