Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Overview Of Cell Separation And Isolation01:20

Overview Of Cell Separation And Isolation

Cell separation was first achieved in 1964 by S. H. Seal, who separated large tumor cells from the smaller blood cells using filtration. Two years later, Pohl and Hawk performed experiments on how cells respond differently to a nonuniform electric field based on the cell type. Such observations were the inception of cell separation methods, which allow isolating a single cell type from a heterogeneous sample.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Modeling epithelial deformation and cell rearrangement in response to external forces during Zebrafish epiboly.

NPJ systems biology and applications·2026
Same author

Who's afraid of synthetic data? Hybrid approaches to deliver medical digital twins.

Informatics in medicine unlocked·2026
Same author

From FAIR to CURE: guidelines for computational models of biological systems.

NPJ systems biology and applications·2026
Same author

Crop-OCT: a Fully Integrated Imageomics Pipeline to Identify Regional and Focal Retinopathy in Murine Models.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

V-Cornea: A computational model of corneal epithelium homeostasis, injury, and recovery.

PLoS computational biology·2025
Same author

Locus coeruleus norepinephrine neurons facilitate orbitofrontal cortex remapping and behavioral flexibility.

Cell reports·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 28, 2026

Adhesion Frequency Assay for In Situ Kinetics Analysis of Cross-Junctional Molecular Interactions at the Cell-Cell Interface
13:22

Adhesion Frequency Assay for In Situ Kinetics Analysis of Cross-Junctional Molecular Interactions at the Cell-Cell Interface

Published on: November 2, 2011

Computer simulations of cell sorting due to differential adhesion.

Ying Zhang1, Gilberto L Thomas, Maciej Swat

  • 1Cancer and Developmental Biology Laboratory, National Cancer Institute, Frederick, Maryland, United States of America. zhangy14@mail.nih.gov

Plos One
|October 27, 2011
PubMed
Summary

This study explores how cells sort themselves during development based on differences in adhesion molecules called cadherins. Previous simulations assumed only a few levels of adhesion, but this work introduces models that account for continuous variations in cadherin expression. Using computer simulations, the researchers found that aggregates with continuous cadherin levels sorted more slowly than those with discrete levels. They also discovered that sorting rates increased with higher interfacial tension, which depends on both cadherin differences and the binding model used. These findings help connect molecular signaling to tissue-level organization, offering new insights into how cells organize during development.

Keywords:
cell adhesioncadherin dynamicscomputational modelingtissue morphogenesis

Frequently Asked Questions

More Related Videos

Creating Adhesive and Soluble Gradients for Imaging Cell Migration with Fluorescence Microscopy
13:10

Creating Adhesive and Soluble Gradients for Imaging Cell Migration with Fluorescence Microscopy

Published on: April 4, 2013

Imaging Molecular Adhesion in Cell Rolling by Adhesion Footprint Assay
08:24

Imaging Molecular Adhesion in Cell Rolling by Adhesion Footprint Assay

Published on: September 27, 2021

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 28, 2026

Adhesion Frequency Assay for In Situ Kinetics Analysis of Cross-Junctional Molecular Interactions at the Cell-Cell Interface
13:22

Adhesion Frequency Assay for In Situ Kinetics Analysis of Cross-Junctional Molecular Interactions at the Cell-Cell Interface

Published on: November 2, 2011

Creating Adhesive and Soluble Gradients for Imaging Cell Migration with Fluorescence Microscopy
13:10

Creating Adhesive and Soluble Gradients for Imaging Cell Migration with Fluorescence Microscopy

Published on: April 4, 2013

Imaging Molecular Adhesion in Cell Rolling by Adhesion Footprint Assay
08:24

Imaging Molecular Adhesion in Cell Rolling by Adhesion Footprint Assay

Published on: September 27, 2021

Area of Science:

  • Computational biology within developmental biology
  • Cell adhesion mechanisms in morphogenesis

Background:

Prior research has shown that cell adhesion molecules like cadherins influence cell interactions and tissue organization. It was already known that gradients in cadherin expression lead to collective cell movements and sorting. However, the exact relationship between cadherin surface density and intercellular adhesion remained unclear. Existing simulations often assumed only a few discrete adhesion levels, which limited their biological accuracy. No prior work had resolved how continuous variations in cadherin expression affect sorting dynamics. This gap motivated the need for models that incorporate realistic cadherin expression gradients. The field lacked a framework to connect molecular binding properties with macroscopic tissue behavior. This paper addresses that limitation by introducing models that bridge these scales.

Purpose Of The Study:

The aim of this study was to investigate how continuous variations in cadherin expression influence cell sorting dynamics. The researchers sought to develop models that capture both discrete and continuous levels of adhesion. They aimed to explore how different binding models affect interfacial tension and sorting rates. The motivation was to improve the biological realism of computational simulations. The study focused on the relationship between cadherin density and intercellular forces. The researchers wanted to understand how these forces drive macroscopic sorting patterns. They also aimed to test how the choice of binding model impacts sorting efficiency. This work contributes to understanding morphogenesis at multiple biological scales.

Main Methods:

The researchers developed three models linking cadherin surface density to intercellular adhesion and interfacial tension. These models accounted for both discrete and continuous cadherin expression levels. The Glazier-Graner-Hogeweg (GGH) model was used to simulate cell sorting dynamics. The simulations varied the number of cadherins per cell and the binding model. The team tested how these parameters affected sorting rates and tissue organization. The models incorporated nonlinearities in molecular binding interactions. The simulations tracked changes in interfacial tension over time. The results were analyzed to determine the impact of different cadherin distributions on sorting behavior.

Main Results:

The simulations revealed that aggregates with continuous cadherin expression sorted more slowly than those with two discrete levels. Sorting rates increased significantly with higher interfacial tension values. The tension depended on both the maximum cadherin difference and the binding model. Aggregates with higher cadherin variation showed faster sorting dynamics. The choice of binding model strongly influenced sorting efficiency. Continuous expression led to slower but more gradual sorting patterns. Discrete expression levels produced more rapid and distinct sorting outcomes. These findings suggest that molecular binding properties shape tissue organization.

Conclusions:

The authors propose that continuous cadherin expression leads to slower sorting compared to discrete levels. They suggest that interfacial tension is a key driver of sorting dynamics. The study highlights the importance of binding model selection in simulations. The results support the idea that molecular-level properties influence tissue organization. The researchers emphasize the need for models that incorporate realistic cadherin gradients. They suggest that nonlinearities in binding affect sorting rates and patterns. The approach helps bridge molecular signaling with macroscopic morphogenesis. These findings may guide future computational studies on cell sorting.

According to the authors, continuous cadherin expression leads to slower sorting than discrete levels.

The researchers propose that sorting rates increase strongly with higher interfacial tension.

The study shows that different binding models affect sorting efficiency and pattern formation.

The GGH model was used to simulate how cadherin expression and binding models influence sorting.

The authors suggest that sorting rates depend on the maximum cadherin difference between cells.

The researchers propose that molecular-level properties shape tissue organization patterns.