Assessing antiangiogenic therapy response by DCE-MRI: development of a physiology driven multi-compartment model

Andreas Steingoetter1, Dieter Menne, Rickmer F Braren

  • 1Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland. steingoetter@biomed.ee.ethz.ch

Plos One
|October 27, 2011
PubMed

Insights

This study introduces a new multi-compartment pharmacokinetic model for dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) to distinguish local drug effects from systemic ones in cancer therapy monitoring.

Area of Science:

  • Pharmacokinetics
  • Medical Imaging
  • Oncology

Background:

  • Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) is vital for monitoring anti-cancer therapies.
  • Current pharmacokinetic (PK) models struggle to differentiate local drug effects from systemic influences.
  • This limitation hinders precise understanding of treatment efficacy.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a novel multi-compartment PK model for DCE-MRI analysis.
  • To enable the separation of local and systemic physiological effects.
  • To improve the specificity of anti-angiogenic therapy monitoring.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a multi-compartment PK model (MTL3 model) using DCE-MRI data from rat hepatocellular carcinoma models.
  • Utilized Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) Bayesian analysis for parameter estimation.
  • Validated the model using histological data and numerical criteria.

Main Results:

  • The MTL3 model successfully separated local (tumor-specific) and systemic physiological effects.
  • Model selection was based on Bayesian plots, residuals, objective function values, and deviance information criterion.
  • Histological covariate modeling confirmed the model's ability to distinguish tumor-specific effects.

Conclusions:

  • Physiology-driven multi-compartment PK models can be developed from DCE-MRI data.
  • The MTL3 model offers a potential tool for precise anti-angiogenic therapy monitoring.
  • This approach can identify specific effectors of vascular and tissue physiology during treatment.

Related Concept Videos

Pharmacodynamic Models: Direct Effect Model and Indirect Response Model01:29

Pharmacodynamic Models: Direct Effect Model and Indirect Response Model

Pharmacodynamic models are essential tools in understanding the relationship between drug concentrations and their effects on biological systems. By characterizing the dynamics of drug action, these models guide dose selection, optimize therapeutic efficacy, and inform the development of new drugs. Two major classes of pharmacodynamic models include direct effect and indirect response models.Direct Effect ModelsDirect effect models describe the immediate relationship between drug concentration...
Pharmacodynamic Models: Overview01:27

Pharmacodynamic Models: Overview

Pharmacodynamic (PD) responses describe the interaction between a drug and its biological target, culminating in a physiological effect. These responses can be classified into different types: continuous variables, such as blood glucose levels; categorical outcomes, like survival rates; and time-to-event metrics, such as disease progression. Understanding and modeling PD responses are critical for optimizing drug efficacy and safety.PD models describe the relationship between drug concentration...
Analysis of Population Pharmacokinetic Data01:12

Analysis of Population Pharmacokinetic Data

Analysis of population pharmacokinetic data involves studying the behavior of drugs within diverse populations to understand their pharmacokinetic parameters. Traditional pharmacokinetic methods typically involve collecting samples from a few individuals and estimating these parameters. While these methods are commonly used, they have limitations in capturing the variability in drug response among individuals or heterogeneous populations. Population pharmacokinetics is employed to address these...
Impact of Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Models: Regulatory Decisions01:15

Impact of Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Models: Regulatory Decisions

PK–PD modeling has significantly influenced FDA regulatory decisions, particularly drug approval, dosage optimization, and labeling. These models integrate pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) to predict drug behavior and effects, aiding in optimizing dosing regimens and enhancing the probability of clinical trial success.One notable example is Nesiritide (Natrecor®), a recombinant human brain natriuretic peptide for treating acute decompensated congestive heart failure (CHF).
Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Relationship: Problems01:24

Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Relationship: Problems

The empirical approach to drug therapy optimization relies on correlating pharmacological response with administered dosage. Such an approach can be costly, time-consuming, and often yields poor correlation due to variables like formulation factors and drug elimination characteristics. A more precise approach correlates response with plasma drug concentration or the amount of drug in the body, rather than dosage. This is achieved through pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) modeling, which...
Model Approaches for Pharmacokinetic Data: Compartment Models01:14

Model Approaches for Pharmacokinetic Data: Compartment Models

Compartmental analysis is a widely adopted approach to characterizing drug pharmacokinetics. It uses compartment models that conceptualize the body as a collection of reversibly communicating compartments, each representing a group of tissues exhibiting similar drug distribution characteristics. The movement rate of the drug between these compartments is typically described by first-order kinetics.
Two primary types of compartment models are recognized: mammillary and catenary. The more...