Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 28, 2026

Dynamic Contrast Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging of an Orthotopic Pancreatic Cancer Mouse Model
Published on: April 18, 2015
Assessing antiangiogenic therapy response by DCE-MRI: development of a physiology driven multi-compartment model
Andreas Steingoetter1, Dieter Menne, Rickmer F Braren
1Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland. steingoetter@biomed.ee.ethz.ch
Abstract:
Dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE-) MRI is commonly applied for the monitoring of antiangiogenic therapy in oncology. Established pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis methods of DCE-MRI data do not sufficiently reflect the complex anatomical and physiological constituents of the analyzed tissue. Hence, accepted endpoints such as Ktrans reflect an unknown multitude of local and global physiological effects often rendering an understanding of specific local drug effects impossible. In this work a novel multi-compartment PK model is presented, which for the first time allows the separation of local and systemic physiological effects. DCE-MRI data sets from multiple, simultaneously acquired tissues, i.e. spinal muscle, liver and tumor tissue, of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) bearing rats were applied for model development. The full Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) Bayesian analysis method was applied for model parameter estimation and model selection was based on histological and anatomical considerations and numerical criteria. A population PK model (MTL3 model) consisting of 3 measured and 6 latent (unobserved) compartments was selected based on Bayesian chain plots, conditional weighted residuals, objective function values, standard errors of model parameters and the deviance information criterion. Covariate model building, which was based on the histology of tumor tissue, demonstrated that the MTL3 model was able to identify and separate tumor specific, i.e. local, and systemic, i.e. global, effects in the DCE-MRI data. The findings confirm the feasibility to develop physiology driven multi-compartment PK models from DCE-MRI data. The presented MTL3 model allowed the separation of a local, tumor specific therapy effect and thus has the potential for identification and specification of effectors of vascular and tissue physiology in antiangiogenic therapy monitoring.
Insights
This study introduces a new multi-compartment pharmacokinetic model for dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) to distinguish local drug effects from systemic ones in cancer therapy monitoring.
Area of Science:
- Pharmacokinetics
- Medical Imaging
- Oncology
Background:
- Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) is vital for monitoring anti-cancer therapies.
- Current pharmacokinetic (PK) models struggle to differentiate local drug effects from systemic influences.
- This limitation hinders precise understanding of treatment efficacy.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop a novel multi-compartment PK model for DCE-MRI analysis.
- To enable the separation of local and systemic physiological effects.
- To improve the specificity of anti-angiogenic therapy monitoring.
Main Methods:
- Developed a multi-compartment PK model (MTL3 model) using DCE-MRI data from rat hepatocellular carcinoma models.
- Utilized Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) Bayesian analysis for parameter estimation.
- Validated the model using histological data and numerical criteria.
Main Results:
- The MTL3 model successfully separated local (tumor-specific) and systemic physiological effects.
- Model selection was based on Bayesian plots, residuals, objective function values, and deviance information criterion.
- Histological covariate modeling confirmed the model's ability to distinguish tumor-specific effects.
Conclusions:
- Physiology-driven multi-compartment PK models can be developed from DCE-MRI data.
- The MTL3 model offers a potential tool for precise anti-angiogenic therapy monitoring.
- This approach can identify specific effectors of vascular and tissue physiology during treatment.
Related Concept Videos
Pharmacodynamic Models: Direct Effect Model and Indirect Response Model
Pharmacodynamic Models: Overview
Analysis of Population Pharmacokinetic Data
Impact of Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Models: Regulatory Decisions
Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Relationship: Problems
Model Approaches for Pharmacokinetic Data: Compartment Models
Two primary types of compartment models are recognized: mammillary and catenary. The more...
