Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 28, 2026

Intraoperative Assessment of Resection Margins in Oral Cavity Cancer: This is the Way
Published on: May 10, 2021
Assessment of latent factors contributing to error: addressing surgical pathology error wisely
Maxwell L Smith1, Stephen S Raab
1Department of Laboratory Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland/Eastern Health Authority, St. John's, Newfoundland, Canada.
Context:
Methods to improve surgical pathology patient safety include measuring the frequency of error in specific steps of the surgical pathology testing process, root cause analysis of active and latent components, and implementation of quality improvement initiatives.
Objective:
To determine the frequency and cause of near-miss events in the specimen accessioning, setup, and biopsy-only gross examination testing steps of anatomic pathology.
Design:
We used an observational checklist method to identify near-miss events. We performed root cause analysis to determine latent factors contributing to near-miss events. We conducted observations for 45 hours during 5 days, involving the accessioning and processing of 335 specimens.
Results:
We detected a total of 2310 process-dependent and 266 operator-dependent near-miss events, resulting in a near-miss-event frequency of 5.5 per specimen. Root cause analysis showed that all process and operator near-miss events were associated with multiple system latent factors, including lack of standardized protocols, appropriate knowledge transfer, and focus on safety culture.
Conclusion:
We conclude that the increased focus on surgical pathology near-miss events will reveal latent factors that may be targeted for improvement.
Insights
Surgical pathology near-miss events occur frequently, with 5.5 per specimen. Root cause analysis reveals system-wide latent factors, such as poor protocols and safety culture, contributing to these errors.
Area of Science:
- Pathology
- Patient Safety
- Quality Improvement
Background:
- Improving surgical pathology patient safety involves error measurement, root cause analysis, and quality improvement initiatives.
- Focusing on near-miss events is crucial for identifying potential patient harm in surgical pathology.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine the frequency and causes of near-miss events in anatomic pathology.
- Investigate near-miss events during specimen accessioning, setup, and gross examination.
Main Methods:
- Observational checklist method used to identify near-miss events.
- Root cause analysis performed to identify contributing latent factors.
- 45 hours of observation over 5 days, processing 335 specimens.
Main Results:
- A total of 2310 process-dependent and 266 operator-dependent near-miss events were detected.
- The near-miss event frequency was 5.5 per specimen.
- All near-miss events were linked to systemic latent factors like lack of standardized protocols, knowledge transfer issues, and inadequate safety culture.
Conclusions:
- Increased focus on surgical pathology near-miss events can uncover latent factors.
- Targeting identified latent factors can lead to significant improvements in patient safety.
Related Concept Videos
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring
Several factors...
Psychosurgery
Historical Development of Psychosurgery
In the 1930s, Portuguese neurologist Antonio Egas Moniz introduced a surgical procedure designed...
Errors and Mistakes in Surveying
Documentation of Nursing Diagnosis
In some settings, data-driven computerized decision support systems are in place, allowing for more accurate nursing diagnoses. The database within one of these systems includes diagnostic labels defining characteristics, activities, and indicators for nursing. A nurse enters assessment...
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...