Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 28, 2026

Fully Endoscopic Mitral Valve Repair with Percutaneous Cannulation of Groin Vessels
Published on: May 26, 2023
Superior outcome with direct catheter laboratory access vs ED-activated primary percutaneous coronary intervention
Bikash Majumder1, Chrysostomos Mavroudis, Colette Smith
1Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Wales, Cardiff, CF14 4XW, UK. bikashmaj@hotmail.com
Insights
Directly admitting ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients to a heart attack center (HAC) catheter lab for primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) significantly reduces treatment times. This bypass of the emergency department (ED) shows improved clinical outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Health Services Research
Background:
- ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) requires rapid reperfusion therapy.
- Traditional STEMI treatment pathways involve the emergency department (ED) before catheterization.
- Optimizing the STEMI treatment pathway is crucial for improving patient outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the clinical outcomes of a redesigned primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) pathway.
- To compare a direct heart attack center (HAC) catheter laboratory access model with the traditional ED-triggered pathway for STEMI patients.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective analysis of 361 consecutive STEMI patients treated with PPCI.
- Comparison of patient outcomes between direct HAC access and ED-triggered PPCI pathways.
- Assessment of door-to-balloon times, call-to-balloon times, and composite clinical endpoints.
Main Results:
- Direct HAC access significantly reduced door-to-balloon (39 vs. 82 minutes) and call-to-balloon (106 vs. 130 minutes) times compared to the ED pathway (P < .0001).
- Patients in the direct HAC group showed a trend towards lower 30-day and 17-month mortality.
- The direct HAC pathway resulted in significantly fewer composite adverse events (e.g., reduced left ventricular ejection fraction, poor myocardial perfusion) compared to the ED pathway (P = .01).
Conclusions:
- A direct-access catheter laboratory model for PPCI, bypassing the ED, is a superior approach for STEMI treatment delivery.
- This service redesign leads to faster treatment times and improved clinical outcomes for STEMI patients.
- Implementing direct HAC access should be favored for optimizing STEMI care pathways.
Aims:
Admitting patients directly to a heart attack center (HAC) catheter laboratory for primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) bypassing the emergency department (ED) might be beneficial in delivering treatment of ST-elevation myocardial infarction with superior outcome.
Methods:
In this analysis, the clinical outcome of service redesign of the PPCI pathway from ED triggered to a direct catheter laboratory HAC access was assessed in 361 consecutive patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction treated with a PPCI.
Results:
A total of 200 patients were admitted via the ED, and 161 were admitted directly to the HAC. Door-to-balloon times and call-to-balloon times were significantly better in the HAC group (median [interquartile range] door-to-balloon times and call-to-balloon times were 39 [26, 53] and 106 [91, 132] minutes, respectively) in comparison with the ED group (82 [49,120; P < .0001] and 130 [103, 164] minutes, respectively [P = .0005]). A nonsignificant trend to a lower 30-day (5% in the HAC group and 6% in the ED group) and 17-month (8% in HAC group and 11% in ED group) mortality was seen in the HAC group (P = .63). Composite end point analysis of left ventricular ejection fraction less than 50%, thrombolysis in myocardial infarction grades 0 and 1, and myocardial blush scores 0 and 1 showed that a significantly higher number of patients in the ED group experienced at least 1 of the composite events in comparison with the patients in the HAC group (P = .01).
Conclusion:
A direct-access catheter laboratory (HAC) model of PPCI bypassing the ED should be the favored approach to service delivery with superior outcome.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Cardiac Catheterization I: Pre-Procedure Overview
Cardiac Catheterization III: Left Heart Catheterization
Cardiac Catheterization II: Right Heart Catheterization
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction

