Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 28, 2026

The Adjuvant Efficacy of Angong Niuhuang Pill in the Treatment of Viral Encephalitis: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Published on: April 19, 2024
CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials.
David Moher1, Sally Hopewell, Kenneth F Schulz
1Ottawa Methods Centre, Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario K1H 8L6, Canada. dmoher@ohri.ca
The CONSORT 2010 Statement enhances reporting quality for randomised controlled trials (RCTs). This updated guideline improves clarity and addresses issues like selective outcome reporting bias for better trial validity.
Area of Science:
- Clinical Trials Methodology
- Evidence-Based Medicine
- Scientific Reporting Standards
Background:
- Inconsistent reporting of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) hinders assessment of findings' reliability and validity.
- Inadequate trial design and reporting are linked to biased treatment effect estimates, compromising the integrity of research.
- The CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) statement was developed to address these quality issues in RCT reporting.
Purpose of the Study:
- To present the revised CONSORT 2010 Statement, an update aimed at improving the quality of RCT reporting.
- To provide an updated explanation and elaboration document to enhance understanding and application of the CONSORT statement.
- To incorporate recent advancements and recognized issues, such as selective outcome reporting bias, into reporting guidelines.
Main Methods:
- Revision of the CONSORT checklist based on expert meetings and scientific evidence.
- Development of an updated explanatory and elaboration document detailing the rationale and examples for each checklist item.
- Inclusion of guidance on flow diagrams and addressing emerging reporting concerns.
Main Results:
- The CONSORT 2010 Statement offers improved wording and clarity over previous versions.
- The updated guidelines incorporate recommendations for newly recognized reporting issues like selective outcome reporting bias.
- The accompanying explanation and elaboration document provides practical examples and references to support good reporting practices.
Conclusions:
- The CONSORT 2010 Statement and its supporting documents serve as crucial resources for improving the reporting of randomised controlled trials.
- Enhanced transparency in RCT reporting facilitates critical appraisal, interpretation, and the extraction of reliable data for systematic reviews.
- Adherence to CONSORT 2010 guidelines promotes higher standards in clinical trial reporting, ultimately benefiting scientific validity and patient care.
Related Concept Videos
Randomized Experiments
Simple randomization
Simple...
Hazard Ratio
For example, in a clinical trial evaluating a...
Clinical Trials: Overview
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Blinding
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...