Metacontrast masking with texture-defined second-order stimuli
Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 28, 2026

Testing Tactile Masking between the Forearms
Published on: February 10, 2016
Evelina Tapia1, Bruno G Breitmeyer, Jane Jacob
1Department of Psychology, University of Houston, Houston, TX, United States. evelina@illinois.edu
Abstract:
We examine metacontrast masking with texture-defined second-order stimuli. Our results reveal that (1) the monotonic type A as well as the nonmonotonic (U-shaped) type B metacontrast effect, which has been extensively examined with first-order luminance-defined stimuli, can be obtained with texture-defined second-order stimuli; and (2) while variations of luminance contrast are known to affect the magnitude of metacontrast with first-order stimuli, neither the size nor orientation contrast between texture elements defining the second-order stimuli have a significant impact on the magnitude or shape of metacontrast. These findings bear on theories of metacontrast masking by showing that the mechanism giving rise to nonmonotonic masking effects can operate beyond the level of first-order stimulus processing.
Related Concept Videos
Masking and Demasking Agents
There are many masking agents, such as cyanide, fluoride, triethanolamine, thiourea, and 2,3-bis(sulfanyl)propan-1-ol (formerly 2,3-dimercapto-1-propanol), with the masking agent chosen based on the metal...
Difference from Background: Limit of Detection
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
Subliminal Perception
Second-order Op Amp Circuits
The analysis of such circuits follows a systematic approach, similar to the second-order RLC circuits. In practical scenarios, bulky inductors are rarely employed due to their size and weight. This means...
Gestalt Principles of Perception

