Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 28, 2026

Whole-body PET/MRI of Pediatric Patients: The Details That Matter
Published on: December 19, 2017
Characteristics and quality of pediatric cost-utility analyses
Seija K Kromm1, Jennifer Bethell, Ferne Kraglund
1Department of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Insights
Pediatric cost-utility analyses (CUAs) are improving in quality over time. However, few studies prospectively measure utility, indicating a need for better pediatric health state valuation tools.
Area of Science:
- Health Economics
- Pediatric Research
- Cost-Utility Analysis
Background:
- Measuring health utility for cost-utility analysis (CUA) in pediatric populations presents unique challenges.
- Understanding the characteristics and quality of existing pediatric CUAs is crucial for improving future research.
Purpose of the Study:
- To characterize pediatric cost-utility analyses (CUAs).
- To appraise the quality of published pediatric CUAs.
- To identify factors influencing the quality of pediatric CUAs.
Main Methods:
- A descriptive analysis of 305 pediatric CUAs from the PEDE database (1997-2009).
- Quality appraisal of 213 studies using the Pediatric Quality Appraisal Questionnaire (PQAQ).
- Multiple regression analysis to assess the impact of publication year, journal type, and utility measurement on quality.
Main Results:
- Pediatric CUAs increased over time, with North America being the largest source.
- Preventative interventions in children aged 1-12 years were most frequently studied.
- Study quality improved significantly over time and was higher in methods/health economic journals; prospective utility measurement was low (8%).
Conclusions:
- The quality of pediatric cost-utility analyses is progressively improving.
- There is a significant need for enhanced instruments for prospective pediatric health state valuation and utility measurement.
Purpose:
Measuring utility for cost-utility analysis (CUA) is challenging in children. The objectives were to characterize pediatric CUAs, appraise their quality, and identify determinants of higher quality.
Methods:
Descriptive data were imported from the PEDE database for 305 pediatric CUAs published from 1997 to 2009, and quality was rated using the Pediatric Quality Appraisal Questionnaire (PQAQ) in 213 studies. The impact on quality of publication year, journal type, and whether utility was measured was analyzed using multiple regression.
Results:
CUAs increased over time and the largest proportion was from North America (38%). Children aged 1-12 years (39%) and preventative interventions (51%) were studied most frequently. Whereas a societal perspective was most common in papers published before 2007 (49%), a third-party payer perspective was subsequently most frequent (63%). Utility was measured prospectively in 8% of studies. Domains that demonstrated the poorest quality were Perspective, Costs and resource use, Outcomes, Analysis, Incremental analysis and Conflict of interest. Quality increased significantly over time for most domains and was greater in studies published in methods/health economic journals.
Conclusions:
The quality of pediatric CUAs is increasing. Few studies ascertain utility prospectively, suggesting the need for better instruments for pediatric health state valuation and measurement.
Related Concept Videos
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Overview and Drug Absorption
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Metabolism
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Excretion
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Distribution
Drug Dosing: Infants and Children
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...