Accuracy of multisensor activity monitors in normal versus high BMI African American children

Daniel Arvidsson1, Mark Fitch, Mark L Hudes

  • 1Center for Primary Health Care Research, Institution for Clinical Sciences, Malmö, Sweden.

Insights

Activity monitors like IDEEA and SenseWear show similar accuracy for energy expenditure in normal and overweight children. Step count accuracy is generally good, especially at walking speeds above 2 km/h.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric obesity
  • Biomedical engineering
  • Human movement analysis

Background:

  • Overweight children exhibit distinct walking patterns compared to normal-weight children.
  • This suggests potential differences in the accuracy of activity monitors between these groups.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the accuracy of two multisensory activity monitors, IDEEA and SenseWear, in normal-weight and high BMI African American children.
  • To compare monitor accuracy across different walking speeds.

Main Methods:

  • Eleven normal-weight and 15 high BMI African American children participated.
  • Participants walked on a treadmill at speeds of 2, 4, 5, and 6 km/h wearing IDEEA and SenseWear devices.
  • Accuracy was validated against indirect calorimetry and manual step counts.

Main Results:

  • No significant differences in energy expenditure (EE) accuracy between BMI groups for IDEEA; speed significantly impacted accuracy.
  • SenseWear showed significant EE accuracy differences between high BMI girls and normal BMI girls at 2 km/h.
  • Both monitors demonstrated larger step count underestimations at 2 km/h compared to higher speeds.

Conclusions:

  • Activity monitors IDEEA and SenseWear demonstrate comparable accuracy for energy expenditure and step counts in normal and overweight children during walking.
  • Monitor accuracy for step counts is reliable at speeds exceeding 2 km/h, with minor errors observed.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos